From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12873: undigestify-rmail-message in emacs 24.x still doesn't split a digest Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:34:40 -0500 Message-ID: <5h625ajq73.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <201211122117.qACLHr8K017024@kcals.intra.maillard.im> <201211122252.qACMqUQR019081@kcals.intra.maillard.im> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352766946 2814 80.91.229.3 (13 Nov 2012 00:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12873@debbugs.gnu.org To: Xavier Maillard Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 13 01:35:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4To-0003iq-SB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:35:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4Tf-0001B6-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4Ta-00019h-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4TX-0008EM-OJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4TX-0008EI-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4Ty-0001SE-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12873 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12873-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12873.13527669115530 (code B ref 12873); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12873) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2012 00:35:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4T8-0001R9-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4T6-0001R1-Js for 12873@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY4Sf-0000xz-4y; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:34:41 -0500 X-Spook: Jiang Zemin Blowpipe jihad New World Order tempest Freeh X-Ran: DbOQN:eWH:{t;jJR!2g`Ld1YCLNkgL6"4fu2CU4.#v{::wdg-tvF}n+jW\E9\1+ (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:30:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66842 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > This is a multipart/mixed message containing a multipart/digest. As per eg section 5.1.5 of RFC 2046, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046#section-5.1.5 so I guess it should be handled better, but don't think it ever has been.