From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What are invisible frames for? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:23:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5e480853-4a3c-4e18-004f-28efe213b21b@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 22 23:24:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZgoF-000AQ0-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:24:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZgoE-00065B-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZgn9-0005VX-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]:35639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZgn8-00086s-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id x27so22832323qvd.2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XgZrlkKdMIBj4C74HbQmcETGxn+hiKdXeGQICxn3hYc=; b=nCssfPym8XX1mDQg29jXd4uYRxfVyA2xIEA9Kk58L1YBUbr20X9HuhtDfxTRjlyrY1 yfbI5EkPP6QgakPZrhWwD7bWgomd9BbxQZEnDzp4ro77TdfXeG6D74bv9gMy+ZWphzxG rgXRykb0vhDRmE/SLqKXKfJ7OFxaxnlnwjt/RrpLe4iECQ5HMhZDiBd/lZzrpLqIPofZ XpKYMngnHsNbhKqmAC14vnZmWy7OW/HgJoVbADvB26YJIsBb0vO96XTL/Ci1IU9rYJYx /EGXHNL0m412spxkono3NN2FhAgNfFwqJN3AZWyLGkCnWu/aW9d/Fno9bzIYBpyB40E9 Futw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XgZrlkKdMIBj4C74HbQmcETGxn+hiKdXeGQICxn3hYc=; b=pZBVhLqSawWEtonW3zKVAwp0PVSMJ84GWxsDn8CHFEoDmZpWZlUfipDUedMH1eKN3O 8IISvfs6EKxX3IdYRqXwZydhKCUmLwXF1/cFBTiMxYW/VKdTmuzO8+41mINVJV/5MP4P I/1ZsNyWBrkfgEael516Pkd0qPBLVDYA5jWR+LxAd/qVyZW7N51x7ZtRet2z/PCVILQT drYb7XY50th7XJ+nBf8S0mwcocAKYHJv2KNzphYRuf58hx26pDhxG4LVi3jq1v/HnK/0 +fki7+vLZ2yOBLzI/jb5+H0yF2UaG/rZ3YsMKVhvzlVEp51CKI9lbyArY7IgHrMvauLu l7vw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532W3JBbbXkCKRGJlqQEqm0wD8BWPey14chtRf6dS7rVCCcx535C QvQb/0HFrqMrWhPpEPdwq5aKOZ9+onc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtrrcQ0Dn6WAkWI7MJOsCXWHZbwtCftW9PXQVH4rdbAYe/EyBJv8QtfQ6NK0nTUvq325y/sQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:104a:: with SMTP id l10mr545256qvr.5.1619126594664; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-24-61-240-80.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.61.240.80]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm3078242qkb.47.2021.04.22.14.23.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c; envelope-from=cpitclaudel@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268292 Archived-At: On 4/22/21 9:18 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> In general, creating a new frame is expensive when you have many faces >> defined (it takes up to two GC cycles here) so temporarily hiding and > > BTW, I wish we could fix this performance bug. Does the patch at https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41200 work for you?