From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: bug#1948: confusion and bug in dabbrev.el Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:37:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e11b932-7132-405e-a26d-48f0e4cff655@default> References: <914a91ca-738e-4ff9-888d-2929a2d7e7ae@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454175502 23265 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2016 17:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 30 18:38:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aPZTO-00008G-7I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:38:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39366 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPZTK-00030d-Cn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPZT6-00030N-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPZT1-0005Nw-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:37:52 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:41340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPZT1-0005Nh-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:37:47 -0500 Original-Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u0UHbj9S018832 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:37:45 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0UHbiRE008009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:37:45 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0UHbiId013076; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:37:44 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.81 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199048 Archived-At: > > Please don't cross-post to the bugs list and emacs-devel. Thx. >=20 > Apologies. Should I even be posting small patches for bug fixes in > emacs-devel, or should they just go to the bug's list? Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that either is OK. I'd suggest the bug list, unless you think that some general discussion about it might be in order.