From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56459: 29.0.50; Edebug disables Eldoc Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:15:41 +0200 Message-ID: <5dd202b1-3dfb-022a-d458-c0a13c1a2d59@yandex.ru> References: <87zghieol4.fsf@gmail.com> <871qurzzyv.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmibzx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <20220731195223.90596.FMU217810@trabanten-schwein.prv.splode.com> <87sfmg1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9590"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Cc: max.brieiev@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, 56459@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Noah Friedman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 03:16:51 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpXt-0002N8-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:16:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpXD-00010T-D3; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpX9-0000yx-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpX9-0003GH-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpX9-0003Ig-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:16:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 02:16:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56459.167755055112628 (code B ref 56459); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 02:16:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 02:15:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpWx-0003Hc-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com ([209.85.208.50]:43590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWpWv-0003HQ-IF for 56459@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id h16so33881799edz.10 for <56459@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 18:15:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LbqNzQn+bgwD2oHkcwBbdtdsPMnBPifpMKizAEDXN98=; b=hLUkCiIaqZDgE4T0pnZ948F2+wQq6lFKkvfb7vYFoZyTMvVlCBo4COsXtubkg9XQW5 wOLRCoiJmsOSpPI6VF/kOAdUUBALYtMZMfObQuQxTWReOAuN2ZHrKS+KCpgOLxzCxJjt mmdB3SZ7CeGRL3Rh3wIXqnF2K5Kl+MbZElKs/iMbLvTlaq30gmYoAua6nKMrCb9z2upI en+Ao4glhMCszLStIO1CNjDxPpsWNCbr5dQBxpCda2Au/iQ7bREemt448Ayzz28M+IKI Rh0or3deShpkKL16vvEH2YXHFfg383AHEqhbezT62/5aPbpNwRqxMzWPEpKCh6OiQ13s VsWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LbqNzQn+bgwD2oHkcwBbdtdsPMnBPifpMKizAEDXN98=; b=HRPipYGi6sxj4u5mHMmMuXuUfEneV1AGRwI8dVesmu9oHy1Kd+X2pmYt0/8iNkQh2h yrji5AR6bkY9Rgz+I/RjHoW/vk+J0S1Mm0xBn/CBpjpT7viHOSpHl4Mpr9nf/gOw0nJt 4fogJgrhD0jM80llIIaqgqPwUOOryYCPNUMTAlAuFoSyz8pZUpAueSQGap1IwqMe/WYu 1aNpyaokgF8ooF/NlwheskMNPv1qGVZxshT4bdkBR+YpT3ATCWQTrki7fNyhJVGbZoZp civ95Doq2Q8yzZr3fl6O7vgyfWuOzrX78K2SSBBhzt8ongWqkQA1tYngWn5iupucEkgG YNJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXvM+lAFaL9EFVSphYOBYThsc4Ww8UnGoIV12yplxZzh7BR3GyV 6r5yJy0vLYE8xDgbljabKkc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/3qoFPJLgMRDRY7aF35vq4fV7pNEFBltdrb+cDlkNBjyEl/DgZ+g1Mr2w8MISRA8U16sTRDA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58c6:b0:8e6:ac94:795d with SMTP id e6-20020a17090658c600b008e6ac94795dmr1773295ejs.2.1677550543716; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 18:15:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r7-20020a170906350700b008b2e4f88ed7sm3905285eja.111.2023.02.27.18.15.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 18:15:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87sfmg1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256932 Archived-At: Hi Lars and others, On 01/08/2022 13:48, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> and the behavior is still that only the edebug results are visible; >> that is, eldoc's messages aren't covering up the edebug messages, but >> they aren't showing up below them either and they're not even showing >> up in any mode line. >> >> So the practical upshot is, I see no change in behavior; whatever >> motivated that change seems to be a non-issue now. > If I remove that check, I don't see any problems -- stepping through the > code doesn't trigger eldoc, so there's no covering up of messages. (But > moving the cursor after stepping triggers eldoc, but that seems fine.) What I'm seeing now, is stepping through Edebug often does invoke Eldoc, which triggers messages which do override edebug evaluations. Which seems like a problem previously solved by that check. Not sure if I've just started seeing this recently due to some later change (but neither eldoc nor edebug's history show anything relevant), or if I'd just actively been ignoring this for half a year.