Okamsn wrote:
> Okamsn wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After testing it more, I see that what I've written does not work as I
>> expected in the case
>>
>> (let ((v    (vector (vector 0 1)
>>                        (vector 2 3)
>>                        (vector 4 5))))
>>      (setf (seq-subseq (seq-subseq (elt v 0) 0) 0)
>>            [10])
>>      v)
>>
>> in which I would expect it to replace the first element of the first
>> sub-vector with 10. I will take more time to continue working on this.
>>
>> Thank you for your patience.
>>
>>
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I found a way to work with subplaces, like in the example in my previous
> e-mail message. Instead of creating the generic feature `(setf
> seq-subseq)` like what is done for `seq-elt`, I created a generic
> function `seq-replace`, which is used in a new `gv-expander` for
> `seq-subseq`. This way of doing it is like what is done for `substring`,
> which has the behavior that I wanted.
> 
> What do you think about this approach?
> 
> Thank you.

Hello,

Since supporting sub-places is controversial, would you please review 
version 2 of the patch that I sent, which I have re-attached for 
convenience. This version /does not/ support sub-places.

I have added Michael Heerdegen to the recipients list in case they would 
like to comment.

Thank you.