From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35353: 26.2; Buffer *xref*: (1) hard-coded mouse-1, (2) major mode name Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 01:49:31 +0300 Message-ID: <5ca19156-ad8f-7ce1-f45f-5fc29629df83@yandex.ru> References: <96cafba3-7ba2-4e87-8f9d-e53825fd1dde@default> <94feda5f-7afa-4ab5-96f8-60dfaba7e0a4@default> <469bf659-07b6-8172-287c-2abc53582447@yandex.ru> <83zhoi74vl.fsf@gnu.org> <44b1aa8a-c06c-61f7-0948-0fd20605e938@yandex.ru> <83y34273mu.fsf@gnu.org> <2979c506-20e4-4b9f-0215-6f0241238678@yandex.ru> <83v9z6732b.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgua70fw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnpe6zpz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="205065"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cc: 35353@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 00:50:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWn-000r81-Qp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 00:50:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWm-0001RQ-Pq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWg-0001RB-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWf-0005PL-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWf-0005PC-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWf-0002Ww-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 22:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35353 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35353-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35353.15568373839696 (code B ref 35353); Thu, 02 May 2019 22:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2019 22:49:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWN-0002WJ-31 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com ([209.85.208.170]:33946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMKWK-0002W6-J6 for 35353@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id s7so3724816ljh.1 for <35353@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 02 May 2019 15:49:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mDang2mtHZx0iyB/rvafuNJku4tFMuQaggfV+078JXQ=; b=hC3/1HlKMCeLEQ0m1e5JmVWn5TtrlpULuzawobo5NGt934DVft1jEbKlnY+jT10paf i1DP9SD1TD2VwuB80Ek9y4r2SP6wZW6t/COlh7W/skHQ94QzHkyKQTiar5d51RjZIoSS KspE81lZSb1OjFOkExSs0gkO+4AF3cE2wooeLZu+FdDnWrO8NyhResAgMAEUumdahGWI CCFUA6OjJV+9oSdjAtZj33PjkMLZxgjxj1W8Vz95pwGdoLkW5woKXyYaiIjBCapMnbiG artJCqvkkI3Aj0sqMTiITxf1lxh2zi2Swsrg7FNvLenfLfKfhDcPSVIc79DjCsvP/Hb6 dvXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mDang2mtHZx0iyB/rvafuNJku4tFMuQaggfV+078JXQ=; b=IsrI93FclA3QHs/5Qn3Av7oksmoxK7YbwRHVAku3y8WATCjUI11Bx0/eRBr8x2FoMl pCEpvYS8iAAlH0a6qrwBF/55W7+CCyQ7JNR0AarCXnP6mvaJ4H8n8ZHzN/HdxarnbRpb RU/8qwtUCJ8i8JmHlpy7+hJsyZoGfn8Dp7cZW7ps8sBpdBd5tvKoi3p7ZjoiMKjVg8+u dXKFNdCmVfzzlfBioHjjFhA/RPmciWx3zkjCWSqFQrVnDeo+zFJGUG5kDGb7Hd1jDtsH z0uF0LH3qKvL1ZQ+8QCbCIKzttaSh7gI016K7Su5NP8JOKjlRNiQnxXywi91QZwvJFDX 0MMg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV5yqLqM06UEP06JGVtmwyCT+h0HAGn2XUuVtcrQJf1LvFxGK1t MfP3PcGvJLCGEAuG1UG1+GgjbVU02cY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlIWQ5B+L//E+5pUh2LsYpTxnfCnRRZzqXS6Joz2Et+m/jYXHCbTuUGo2LPkuIJjKVA6sR+g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4a09:: with SMTP id x9mr2889437lja.19.1556837374413; Thu, 02 May 2019 15:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k26sm74241lfb.63.2019.05.02.15.49.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2019 15:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83pnpe6zpz.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158674 Archived-At: On 22.04.2019 14:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > To tell the truth, I fail to see how mouse-2 and mouse-1 are different > in the default configuration. (They are bound to different commands, > but the effect is the same, AFAICT.) The difference is in which window ends up being selected. Maybe it's not hugely important, though (I don't remember the last time I used mouse-2 for this purpose).