From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:38 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5a4bbe6d-08ce-e6c6-39d1-49c9cd6d1ffd@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87twe6sx2g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpgzo30m.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477215546 8946 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 09:39:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:39:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 11:38:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byFEv-0000EI-Vc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:38:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byFEy-0006IB-C3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byFEs-0006Hv-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byFEr-0007Z6-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:49030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byFEm-0007Wx-R2; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BB31606D6; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id vywC1NKxQjnA; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074C160FF5; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id a2gZHclOa4qX; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [47.153.178.162]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2FB3160FB1; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wpgzo30m.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208612 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Can you share the concerns and the tests you'd like to be performed? I wrote something along those lines in Bug#23529; see the URL below. My m= ain=20 concern is startup time and energy. I don't have detailed benchmarks. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D23529#197