From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:58:37 +0300 Message-ID: <5a36fdc0-7735-3b24-6c79-8feb0ee55c51@yandex.ru> References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87oa9dzgl0.fsf@gmx.de> <87potshczh.fsf@gmx.de> <87h9f4ghzg.fsf@gmx.de> <87oa97ksnr.fsf@gmx.de> <4df44cce-b7d5-a9cd-23a2-026de38588b2@yandex.ru> <87r3e3m62o.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460984366 17185 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2016 12:59:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 18 14:59:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1as8ln-0000Ym-Hk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:59:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1as8lh-0005K5-Ul for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1as8ld-0005GV-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1as8la-0000ow-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1as8la-0000os-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1as8la-0002ZI-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20637.14609843279844 (code B ref 20637); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2016 12:58:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1as8lL-0002Yi-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:35685) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1as8lJ-0002YS-4J for 20637@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id a140so24448925wma.2 for <20637@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U03rrXe/aaShJ0QpDj7Z9/IdLE8LTRuJZ+W/gXhRRwc=; b=RtaGirT0jVQ0w16QGjyBz+THBIkanexp1qYsfLcAAdHUfL2aIwl7EGn42Xa4X8sKRd nrd3UzIG2VTSedo/RvCSpVyGIxM6vwyxLBLgVPGk97QJDsjHikpuNOBDHM4iI0u5Rtmy z0wYIsXaIu2RHSi0eY7EGm2ZIeFpROATnfYEO4GyT3ARamGKrGBxsF7gIZb61GoMM5Hz +qGYjSBHQkrMf4iGkXV6u9mBvzQowPoFCqUBSA+v2bp1YWA2vWVP96+2Vz2HR+0vChmB qIyanUXLchacghN5aq/hei9/fONx7K2lYGYHa4XJC2CH5UC7CYIVlIdlqgkv1jZK9bPK v32w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U03rrXe/aaShJ0QpDj7Z9/IdLE8LTRuJZ+W/gXhRRwc=; b=UGQM+BH4tF5gGP1xg1NjYwyFTEgZS4l17pFzU+9KgWLOhQVoVRpICdz6SfNLdcuxVZ k2KNcSa24S+vBlTXZBMJxyLmSa3dV3aPyiF37Sr5vG7kKsw15b0Mh5zVmq7z+YiJHdGT uJz6346OAwdfuupdSHm9YkSGOe1/nl5nTb5QevjbwEmCRB3uR2Fa4vgFc2k6b2FI8ieU 91Qa7fh6RnNope1PsQHm3XPgBgmUIweewkVXBmIwSQI0ppKaCZ7rc/0DUU1+k43G84V2 ePGkKnh3XqdlNHPQUeNew95Xb6aLNiFnR7bEYc5wdwHIbj7IdWMvl7L1w7s+i9KbMVBk 0uiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXJvl89MyMDYQb5J7OKp4Iw1iRUxia7QCx0of8gIQWj0IY27h/xF/aE6MzEXKejJg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.76 with SMTP id bu12mr35426523wjb.79.1460984319493; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gl8sm64037167wjb.30.2016.04.18.05.58.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:58:38 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87r3e3m62o.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116592 Archived-At: On 04/18/2016 03:53 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: >> It would be a revert to the code that has been in use for a while. > > The current code has been in use for 11 months. Beside this bug report, > nobody has worried about that. And the problems this bug report speaks > about are solved, I believe. They are. >> Nothing absolutely necessary about that, but it might be prudent to >> revert the changes made without clear understanding why they should be >> made. Please correct me on this if I'm wrong, of course. > > Again, it is a matter of not touching code so close to a release. 35+ > years experience in software development tell me so. Often enough I've > changed just one single line, because "it is obvious it cannot be > wrong". Haha. Fair enough. We can revert them on master, though.