bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

miha@kamnitnik.top writes:

>     *** Welcome to IELM ***  Type (describe-mode) or press C-h m for help.
>     ELISP> (set-buffer (get-buffer-create "a"))
>     ELISP> (insert "int main();")
>     ELISP> (require 'treesit)
>     ELISP> (treesit-node-children (treesit-node-child (treesit-buffer-root-node 'c) 0))
>     (#<treesit-node
>       (primitive_type)
>       in 1-4> #<treesit-node
>       (function_declarator)
>       in 5-11> #<treesit-node ";" in 11-12>)
>
> This is expected
>
>     ELISP> (set-buffer (make-indirect-buffer "a" "b"))
>     ELISP> (goto-char (point-min))
>     ELISP> (insert " ")
>     ELISP> (set-buffer "a")
>     ELISP> (buffer-string)
>     " int main();"
>
>     ELISP> (treesit-node-children (treesit-node-child (treesit-buffer-root-node 'c) 0))
>     (#<treesit-node
>       (primitive_type)
>       in 1-4> #<treesit-node
>       (function_declarator)
>       in 5-11> #<treesit-node
>       (ERROR)
>       in 11-12> #<treesit-node ";" in 12-13>)
>
> This is unexpected. If we had called '(insert " ")' in the base buffer
> "a", we would have got
>
>     (#<treesit-node
>       (primitive_type)
>       in 2-5> #<treesit-node
>       (function_declarator)
>       in 6-12> #<treesit-node ";" in 12-13>)
>
> Thanks for your hard work.

Thanks! I forgot about indirect buffers... We’ll need to make sure to
use the parsers in the original buffer when user edits the indirect
buffer, or something like that. I need to look into how does indirect
buffer works.

Yuan