From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Defuns in comint Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 16:04:34 -0700 Message-ID: <5DF72E31-D02C-4B4D-93A5-A04E7C372EC1@dancol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=----5DEO69UTY4008L0PJOU6MVYV8SIEXD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34203"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 04 01:05:36 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1swUt5-0008js-Tp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 01:05:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swUsF-0001lK-Ml; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swUsE-0001l8-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swUsC-00035V-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:04:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject :To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RfHtTZJQFDjjXZw7PBn80zqheqrhY+Ygku6tV9fwrS8=; b=N 3XcvpgwX9roq++Vx5WY9J6a4UOVo3X9cR06KCMtMsS3K1Hw3JQawwKYbAPzmB3tuQ/IarBLSJXmp2 ZCqC1cF4O+xDQbRuIXNNEum5UAZP6Ww2eBPNCMxgr0yrDDUB4Am9kk2ZYFxTTg0Q6IAS2Cws1+VXg fWZpv63rl1kf0viaT2GS/NtVMVqchKKoJN9f0HBhOuXDmTY+YCiQz/dj7QECt1dRTsv5ft3oH25Es MipJyhUwhA2zMrSga3U5CIdKqCg2PdTF9Hpcx7rLK9inaXigqMHlGFBkMhwutyUSeuaBH1RNtAtCg GseG8Hvrcfi4j08Nz9Kme4WnPbSAsgslg==; Original-Received: from [2600:1010:b06a:1783:0:4b:ab26:f601] (port=52112 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1swUs7-0000sm-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:04:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1; envelope-from=dancol@dancol.org; helo=dancol.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324292 Archived-At: ------5DEO69UTY4008L0PJOU6MVYV8SIEXD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How would people feel about defining defuns in comint mode as subprocesses = outputs? This way, the same navigation keys people already have become more= useful in comint mode without breaking anything, because defun navigation = in comint is useless today=2E If not defuns, then paragraphs? Sentences? I feel like there should be *so= me* way of using existing sets of movement and marking commands to talk abo= ut outputs, and probably inputs=2E ------5DEO69UTY4008L0PJOU6MVYV8SIEXD Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How would people feel about de= fining defuns in comint mode as subprocesses outputs? This way, the same na= vigation keys people already have become more useful in comint mode without= breaking anything, because defun navigation in comint is useless today=2E<= br>
If not defuns, then paragraphs? Sentences? I feel like there should = be *some* way of using existing sets of movement and marking commands to ta= lk about outputs, and probably inputs=2E
------5DEO69UTY4008L0PJOU6MVYV8SIEXD--