From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Objective C coding style Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:15:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5D802AC1-DD5C-483B-BC74-5484292EF2CD@swipnet.se> References: <4A0F74AB-1CBA-4397-B1F9-8817832823DA@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342084561 5465 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2012 09:16:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Samuel Bronson Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 12 11:16:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SpFV9-0004lG-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:15:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47273 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SpFV8-0008UW-Gc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SpFV3-0008UL-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SpFUw-0001du-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:61356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SpFUw-0001ZU-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C492F7 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 28171 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jul 2012 09:15:38 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 12 Jul 2012 09:15:38 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75E967FA06C; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:15:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4A0F74AB-1CBA-4397-B1F9-8817832823DA@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151551 Archived-At: Hello. 12 jul 2012 kl. 03:15 skrev Samuel Bronson: > I've noticed that the Objective C code of the NeXTstep port doesn't = have a very consistent style. I expect this is something to do with the = fact that (standards.info) doesn't cover Objective C. Would it be = appropriate to adopt the GNUstep coding style? How does that style look? Is it "compatible" with the GNU C-style, for = example w.r.t. braces? Jan D.