From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org-capture changes the buffer ring in a confusing way Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:05:51 +0200 Message-ID: <5C85BF27-AD1A-4240-ADAD-F54D7E059DD0@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFRyj-0004Ce-PO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:55:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFRyd-0005zf-19 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:55:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22b]:60946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFRyc-0005zI-QT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:55:14 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e52so1041837eek.16 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Samuel, Unfortunately, right now, I don't know a good way to avoid this. Org = switches to a special buffer while filling in the template, in order to = allow interactive prompts, and I think this might be the cause of = messing with the buffer list. - Carsten On 19.8.2013, at 05:44, Samuel Wales wrote: > When I use capture, the buffer ring ordering changes from what it was > before the capture. It even changes when I cancel the capture. Is > there a way to keep it exactly as it was in all cases? >=20 > What I expected was that previous-buffer would be the same before and > after and that next-buffer would be the same before and after. [In > other words, that capture + capture finalizing would not change > anything. The philosophy of capture, to my understanding, is that > capture is intended to allow you to take a note with minimum > distraction.] >=20 > What I tried was org-capture. >=20 > What I noticed was that the buffer ring ordering had changed. >=20 > I have previous-buffer and next-buffer set to function keys, and I > find them extremely useful. But when the buffer ring ordering > changes, I get confused. So capture confuses me. >=20 > Also, it seems to always split the window. Is there a way to fix that > that is better than my current method of deleting other windows in the > hook? I always require a single window. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > Samuel >=20 > --=20 > The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com >=20 > The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY = can get it. >=20 > Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW. >=20