From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34516: Multi-monitor frame sets Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 09:44:31 +0100 Message-ID: <5C72596F.9010707@gmx.at> References: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pnrpjb44.fsf@gnu.org> <8736okvlv2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86sgwkawnx.fsf@gmail.com> <87imxfv519.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <865ztf73x0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ftsip36g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h8cuw7s6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="244119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34516@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov , Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 09:45:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPS-0011PM-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 09:45:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPR-00005B-Ib for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPD-0008UU-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPC-0001FC-Q7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPC-0001F5-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpPC-0007OH-GJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 08:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34516 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34516-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34516.155099788728367 (code B ref 34516); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 08:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2019 08:44:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49828 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpOv-0007NR-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:38897) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxpOt-0007NC-GN for 34516@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:44:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.91]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lx8vJ-1h4mM70FBJ-016iUC; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 09:44:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8cuw7s6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VEwODjjs/KPcvb4ezagSVSz+apcwnOWdqm88QJWQHXrL9DV3i8v a9JnO/vdZQlt0sjvlqr7BIsL+PhWBfZnf6L7y7XxGqTPHTKoSW37aJxf3yFU6R0kT7MDqJS 2GZh/R+WvkbKi8Exskyjp1L5S0syIRax9Uj4+wzmipmIh86a2GUB6bEU7/awnXyqk6IwlHk guLNW6KZizm7xTbSB3WxQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OJ8cNPF50Ho=:CXSWvcM0/gQ0IfSK0Prbyl uHXAf+xZDuYGiWU+uGMkaMHmRtX8x4QFk5f2k74FvxaPovU5g8bxJ0qBSgOUkYeTjEmjvcdVy DRGANFtlMP+jBzS7/98O3DxaXqiKsu9IblFHRwS+3BtKd63kiw6sVdttkHJWZHzNoaLJyAjWn 2M0/h3awiGk1JcbFYMPFKTFaDLFWURUqJ+cuyt/fNg0ht3yqrUVDV1CfEB5qI4yHt1TxY4+Ue BzdK2ihCmkoJIVoiiBL9ys+NyHiZrYRqXI6jVkHAw3sNwasbSoBlocBk1aFnwRFlsNOt2joPK 7hzA6QNVsWlEEVsN8ZE91qhKmzFP5lFVowqj6DdK8kvBtpJIqzBtYtYi79Lj2IJFCeB/ZFG+N eomodoiC1X/s6zT7g3bLyg0DAelSdCTJOgLo+Y8OJdmsX1AdK3O2IjKG7LNIN7QqkoxbsedCb vwCfuq5mPBlj0tgXhjfmXvQHGrtL4YIFKnA20yolq2GLzjE2gduSrXFiAt1WqgTcGV8TvzluO BAv6jcnUEcy2RHHWwKPoECMX/cv36vAUF+STgKVM3FSzZUkB/HyqYEtqxys/LtYWSIx4UT5mr rn635o5E//RHIOeWzZ3QeUmZMly5YyCXVqkBC3AlFn81aJv3bDxuY7awuigBGdDOwov76/JqE UL6NcFObNWVQyEq4ihvP2Q780dZtkJ30WuhywNALSJEgs8eSLRZ4Cp893Xh0QAiwXMZYkyNVC HbOYAqoM4DPy+mz/3LjyaHKQYpWKv+A/3VxWoBPoUIhaKFwN6pbCpU9G7zgCOwGJVtKlVva+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155710 Archived-At: >> You should always use the workarea values for displaying emacs frames. Much easier said than done. > Ok, this patch uses the workarea instead: AFAICT, the workarea may "move" from one display to another. So to be on the safe side, code should always assume the presence of a workarea even when there's none at the very moment. But I have no idea whether the workarea size and position may change when moving from one display to another. martin