From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33921: 27.0.50; Default height is inconsistently - and apparently also incorrectly - documented Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:00:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5C2915E3.1070305@gmx.at> References: <877efrxrpe.fsf@metalevel.at> <5C28DCEB.909@gmx.at> <87zhsmq2ir.fsf@metalevel.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546196347 17582 195.159.176.226 (30 Dec 2018 18:59:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33921@debbugs.gnu.org To: Markus Triska Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 30 19:59:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgIh-0004T4-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:59:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKo-0005kE-09 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKg-0005k1-Qo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKd-0005cq-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKd-0005cQ-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKc-0002Kf-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33921 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33921-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33921.15461964608943 (code B ref 33921); Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33921) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2018 19:01:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKZ-0002KA-Uv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:41347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKY-0002Jw-Hf for 33921@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:00:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lp3x6-1hIUjI2J5Y-00esme; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:00:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zhsmq2ir.fsf@metalevel.at> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:s4lcdnvOKT9ZgawS5RI5IZDNEZNDcHuCiQFJIF7XKJqRgQludCw KhJdYihrHC3CLHWKczionCKk1VE8OLSmAmS6p9pg8b5PzYnxG7SSh+8wcfbHh6DnmxZP4KT 1JOI7Ree0xrgK2MkO5qZDTXA85E6ZvCwrNlvOVgovByGkDhwki1npa08WyTDcjeUT6tvmKS Ao6Zbo8WmKJYzIMLPrcHw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:4XAxKjFJKSc=:sOQDpGDjLw9jMMVp7TtF9R Zb8ouZkcqwfZTIOL/NeZGxVQGpmhn9oLXxjOhEwMjRukd809D6fK5uunFSIsnKaYHlQFQKcSx jGrECWV4OkwtzYnZIPCHJ+KuxE0hWHSwwjCON/+uXmzoApjV/N0Bx0Ri12mYSuBh3pm798XwV z2dbGZ65wuwHZKKaXxpxMd8xaaelqmLfmHrdTkK799q766Yi5g9Qg6s9O8giTpkZUxsr9mjNv gg0faCw7pyuafPCicxEcg4USzmmJse74Ub+IknsM8wf7lkr8hLlEj3TpsPamazpKI4DzI2Tf/ UedHDtsr88n2l9+L8aEl8TkUPvYiLOJDfXk4AU6SiX4kUFCujA/sxIU9Z2kYyeq9nuzMqTeoj bBTuXzIEHBu1adJ6/zPSf9HUIIM+QlVgnJoh5OYKq+gQUwPCl6cvSUMQSSVX9ZA7XqivvopCr BBBtfhkNPSUVEemGMQ4SAY8PmkIlA0bktS9pgYlMHjY9Trz2SHpIGUwYBCaLUzGOXbkw4Z9fu N0iRSiky5gXvnTaO18yUgjVsoebWottfXi8XisqCLktDpc3P6JLaf5RT7hk0iNDnWiYLwYP7O M2Gx3Ba2XgfxbkjcMWkyRiA515lWfgyQnFnvlnIC4wLLdrZkgcN+EkrbbbXQFakNxIj++5JMs pRhR/SZ+9MYcGcsAq8sod723lymXD/S5nEetyjpnTP/9hcRRZEhdHR9fLUpJYNTHVvngb65J2 f3akZoGK5O+qg15HN2zp2ZmInUSg56dbx1iacI1ukpEyXFe4bk32Kve2c3mgXyRA9za2xHnk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154032 Archived-At: >> Evaluating (frame-height) with emacs -Q should yield 36. What does it >> give for you? And what is your value of (window-total-height) for the >> initial window? It's 35 here. > > (frame-height) yields 29, and (window-total-height) yields 28. Hmm... then it's not even vague according to Eli. I'm afraid you have to use the debugger to find out what goes wrong. For starters I would set a breakpoint at the beginning of x_figure_window_size (in frame.c) and check whether any height setting gets applied. > When I run (set-frame-height nil 36), then (frame-height) yields 36. > > So, it's possible to obtain this frame height, and ideally this should > also be obtainable with the "-g" option. > > I tried all this with the window manager FVWM as shipped with Debian. If FVWM interferes we will find out soon enough. martin