From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current master does not work with sr-speedbar package (W64 build) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:13:35 +0100 Message-ID: <5C0A1D9F.1080803@gmx.at> References: <1723869815.291238.1543945851468@mail.libero.it> <831s6x9ntx.fsf@gnu.org> <1892341033.303375.1543966279338@mail.libero.it> <835zw7961j.fsf@gnu.org> <1181980169.366424.1544051247329@mail.libero.it> <83va476u3t.fsf@gnu.org> <115637468.396419.1544086829368@mail.libero.it> <83mupj6mlm.fsf@gnu.org> <1416933916.408019.1544095693412@mail.libero.it> <1266357133.430788.1544118598533@mail.libero.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544166771 13178 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2018 07:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 07:12:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 08:12:47 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gVAJZ-0003Ka-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:12:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44546 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVALg-0007GT-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVAKq-0007GO-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVAKi-0000xo-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:45151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gVAKi-0000vk-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 02:13:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.119]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGBB1-1gjCgc3nAV-00F8fq; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:13:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/j+ucmVc8ICmk6U4cXq0mSzosEhDbXTBsbzKH6CyzL3XpPCXtoY XNKTtNwOfA+wpILU6NKQ/F+EO6THO+7vjzMXtXmyM8jlS9aIR8glIJmkUMT6k9vXVwXmsRc v/q0mOdIP4H7abHtsAslodNuRodpL23WISv+4fRGiZeBfg4AWOS/qLjfaCFvOGbT0eHch7Q JOymOLczYxGFWDPl0qVGw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:P08M0y1JCe4=:UF7ytToFIQun4mU5GTUiXS jL/hGPn/cwcIMP6vS2LVKm6g5Bi+jRq0wdxnql0vKb6qQE6bqdLpJdY8TsO9Oq+I/MFQmwNaP 5oqYT1x7qH1AUshuLA7Ytf5gYn0Jq7PeqFf2Vf88OeZDZSFq0/xRLRDgB/ZJdggUoRxrctsp+ eZwyAOB45m0iHo40hCYLWnlCvCZxWA/me7jieqZ0suWRxlzPuJPFXGIdIzKduLM9bqbBNm8vq noBAUZJVVTB4H/QYuk6e8po5UBPWEmho+rDasckAm2IRcOFzMn0AY6lN145kolxvCpPx9H5fw iRPdha1wnE6hqB87Cx6QRiXUTeqdJiAgsVYE/Xv3A94VA9XLoiLWN4UtPOzBfLveSou+LbGWp YvdCfecG3jUKqaSdUYera1EU9w4wHN6D/cKQOtH24B4BDGUD6GGLRQK43+uUOL72UzExMIXKJ S2gyE/QK+QkKkHvVuod7ix+8r8NS3PhBuvRRAhAQ5+UR6MzpCgBEVo/T6EpoK2+foNuSdMGYK qM0un8dyia4DQauVHgLYQN+xAt+MUciKeoh0fqdrislGvU9vlI4Xlv4tmKheCXkhYbMteyhib +FvqTSSw3gJdGDiKYMobwG/s0QWJ4BrVtGN6oDLvkYp5SxW+s2tKmY90OfUceNSgW66UY81kF WvPduSLxJkeoA2AeDw2L3/qpYTjFiaTD9ZNXfRQV84n4WR6Ldq1tq81ifVFVUnFNJMNE3tfJQ XSo8ci7WZdpgX3dmZHHe6TtKbxP/SUoqu+im0Inm1jhOHeXdAE0mnExOaePkFm3DZMOLyq+F X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231706 Archived-At: >> (closure (...) (status) (let ((b-sym (current-buffer))) (require 'url-handlers) ... > > This is weird: the above code seems clearly to come from package, but > you should be running code from package.elc instead (IOW the above code > is not byte-compiled whereas it should be). > > It's probably unrelated to your problem, but it might be worthwhile to > investigate why that is. > > Can you look at `load-history` to see if indeed `package.el` was loaded > instead of `package.elc` and if so, check from where it was loaded (is > it some extra copy you have lying around somewhere) and why there's no > .elc file next to it. Can you tell me how package.elc _could_ be loaded after you gave it the ;;\sno-byte-compile: t directive? martin