From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32790: 27.0.50; point jumps unexpectedly after delete-window Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:45:25 +0100 Message-ID: <5C04DF15.6050701@gmx.at> References: <87efdnsp2k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pnuzz2vf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BF5151B.5000201@gmx.at> <87ftvu9f20.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BF65D56.9020806@gmx.at> <87pnuwenpk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BF7AEC5.60808@gmx.at> <87va4mdoya.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BFA5BF3.50505@gmx.at> <87bm6can2p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BFBBDD4.7050100@gmx.at> <87pnurjt92.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lg5fgivk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8g2m9ii.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BFE52CC.4000600@gmx.at> <87woowrdi9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BFFA3C0.9070102@gmx.at> <87tvjz8pmt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5C00F336.8010406@gmx.at> <878t18eumi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5C039907.5030104@gmx.at> <87sgzftohw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543823046 14294 195.159.176.226 (3 Dec 2018 07:44:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32790@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 03 08:44:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTitd-0003Zv-3p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:44:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTivj-0002ZP-KT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:46:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTivd-0002ZI-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTiva-0005ru-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTiva-0005ro-4z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTivZ-0007qN-Ug for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:46:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 07:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32790 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32790.154382314230110 (code B ref 32790); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 07:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2018 07:45:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTivG-0007pa-CH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:33953) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gTivE-0007pI-Do for 32790@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:45:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ltr89-1hSJnb0zC9-011Cbv; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:45:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87sgzftohw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:xqTtBlT36mU9DvWoWOhL/QwbJuuERIllVLOwSii2cKL8JRuVnwU Kpoe2sIA03FCq9L0fSuxwWXX03FJt1iVTZEbYx5WEAb1yd5ELXgy3NKAOXJ2TRXdTi78NJd 2hfPE285jXx3CZqLZgwRSSORAViHj9z4XgR18XxFhFvyzgz6gtEwa0Eyu0r4Q5KIx4nOnaB 6gq6V20laQvPGUkgyR4rQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:MLQSO88vr6I=:KdsH2TMBk8sgV0ByTZLYZI L/K4yokSRc7nxP1gCR3duzn7uf6IdEeEAOQtuhXF235JXN0i3kINzq46eXTvymOzI0ObiU3+0 /fqMsm/qgEK/bdQFwdPb+YqjTXAfGBFUuIlnqekkm+xOe+tjz5etsf61x92HNJY2VRp1+igNt 6jYiFGYJQC0eJBFHjoWqHvLhArDt8Rk3gfbH/08V2Q/9yd9s4WuAmOpw4LbW73IFW8RcLWyqZ T9dRXxmFKPeL3LuZWcn927Lni3U7lm2nKYjpZ3gmjyOILRS7fqOIUl8IYA1KqKDk3BvsvUOBB Co4ocfavyHiJc97TAJW7g/6NA5dj2GXCxmh2X0aqP+kDEck5Kxu1ZfuX28n6AGwfBpqjybxju PMK2p8sPv4EfSf/bT+LCssPln86r8LX+LKg+JPPXvaxMbYl5ZSoY/WnZMFLHEU2UW9+ZGHple rTwgrF5jCw4YE1YcmElAtsCudnjzGgngWUyegU3HYrLIaxavfKP7Bz/gsTjtEWXiX0mXgj86g D6xo/k4i13z/F8QL8iiAtnGbpDrgvDXGD3Oqc7K3jyOqeh5MpL6/DWTWRohUsTUWDWp57Uhin +AO0PWTa7WoXCkgY1ZXfuN1E9qcSZn73lmgUmlCAws7N3kDAVesYWd4utd0eVmDbHj4mFYReh +o1WHTz4N2pKzXf9OchMD+M3UZS9xXbw33dwean2BUF9uQunTt71oanbsoPxnOQSWY4G4jBSg emJDZ1g/luMD2dhLxpyMbvcQ8EtRoDKFNa4OJbY5oJVxpmHps27oT4nwgCGws8vnVKeA5Dcg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153018 Archived-At: > We already added this to the docstring two patches ago. > This was the part of that change: > > If optional argument FORCE-SAME-WINDOW is non-nil, the buffer > must be displayed in the selected window when called > non-interactively; if that is impossible, signal an error rather > -than calling `pop-to-buffer'. > +than calling `pop-to-buffer'. It has no effect when the option > +`switch-to-buffer-obey-display-actions' is non-nil. And I told you to remove it? >> 'switch-to-buffer' should not signal an error when the window is >> dedicated or the minibuffer window but try to automatically display >> the buffer in a window of its choice instead. > > Do you think this is right? Yes. No more pretensions, please install. Thanks, martin