From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32825: 27.0.50; Deterministic window management Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:46:45 +0100 Message-ID: <5BE154F5.4050902@gmx.at> References: <874leeaiah.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wor7uqgb.fsf@web.de> <87o9bhkeih.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h8h9hk4w.fsf@web.de> <87d0rvb7xg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sh0rkucr.fsf@web.de> <87d0rvqf5r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k1m3krvm.fsf@web.de> <87o9bf13b4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0rvkq01.fsf@web.de> <5BD57C2B.7020109@gmx.at> <87tvl3rvks.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BD96392.3040008@gmx.at> <87y3adakkh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BDAC0ED.9030405@gmx.at> <87h8h0juwn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BDC0E38.5020901@gmx.at> <87d0rl7kl1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BDEB6BA.5000307@gmx.at> <87y3a8jz6v.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BE00EB1.6090107@gmx.at> <87sh0fxkih.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541494204 30509 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2018 08:50:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 32825@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 06 09:49:59 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx3e-0007o2-FR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:49:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx5l-0002wm-0z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx5R-0002od-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx0o-0007sC-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx0o-0007s2-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx0o-0005Z4-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 08:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32825 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32825-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32825.154149402021382 (code B ref 32825); Tue, 06 Nov 2018 08:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32825) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2018 08:47:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx0l-0005Yo-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:57213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJx0k-0005Yb-0X for 32825@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.68.231]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVvDo-1g06nA32V6-00X5QD; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:46:48 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.68.231]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVvDo-1g06nA32V6-00X5QD; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:46:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87sh0fxkih.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:IRt/Ct3SHgoPXKaZoyF3sXaSVT1wPnKmZXebb/wIIiJXEyZD+2v SCxe8jPi6B1gL8VPvXJdb7ob4aBVwDxYwhK4Il7AVjUX8yWg4/sQZmOXpU1PjEonAebiY3m E0miCYU455020RPeuAI5gYg667cOlXz59ZVXhAAygAVySp+GgRHdh08S8LsohSYK73GjF0D O3Dm4eNJ3OZ8JSpCyrfMw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uQUs+8tT9xk=:/Cf5tD9NuOjZmJDGL1ng6s CkNXuwnFaPQGUUo2yHuGDjcksaNbCJmF1Ifdw8rHSZNpybfM+Fle7vJYzqtdzu2k4ThtxE3iJ yWo5AtgLhk5TSnJzA0TshvLtSeEUpA8dNLUKA5L/5UQB5Fsys1FeCUuvUYXv18tNfkt7y2zv7 xNLnZf5pVgBjd2C04QZM9tI9lfV6HhwURpMXomlE1QeDBJDQTzA/4amoI/nafjdtycOC8VHCn 18l/qPcNL4mhpojxBwCJ4st3DmLaF0Odpodj+U5Kxj5//Xy5wCVdj1uKS/YDicjAyGfKc50fI ZtO1S18cKeawMG9w/6dt/Ukrr37lN4s+dbQbK6NrAVwtbRxOkICOp4jxETd5US5shWyGTY5ZX FUZVWcCMFJJ7FoIk28oE5KyTyT0FoMFE+uFFpSJZ7yj9+6iQuWuGilR5MViY5NvqfPOsKUswx 0Q30i0JsZDzlbbs2ArSR/nLHTnb095GQIyJz7VKtYLw0EMyanmguPmwSP8Lmx9G6mYZG9TkH4 htVsjaDVUs3ZazTXM/q0O0Rii1tp9Ru0pDMyMXrQVfJKsUnkRDK91luYtHu7E3kobj7aJZJyA oerfKB71RqmFVjsAhh1XcE7ObHdKuunNGSrORySzMshatSSKhe0wum6ehxkSuP8eUs3zkPDrY Hc2uc99TFyGxbQgeaMnAb6Zn90K3YF9fgEGqfUNrXx8KfQeA+Oh31334iVEIHV+4HeaE/vVTe b7i+EDqJl4JJvqMJI9BDtxHrtCI6/CaSCCE5ZRKRX5zcI9TxOtv9em/T6LhfdiN1sbpf8fE7 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152094 Archived-At: > Maybe I misunderstand something, but I see that already everything is > working fine. When I tried with display-buffer-below-selected > to cause an error in a narrow buffer at the bottom of the frame, > then the *Backtrace* buffer is displayed in a new window created > by horizontal splitting of the largest window on the frame. I never doubted that it works correctly (IIRC Michael did). But from what you tell above it's obvious that you tried with customizations of the initial frame size which cause 'split-window-sensibly' to prefer a horizontal split over a vertical one. Right? If so, then since most users of Emacs do not have such customizations, your invocation hardly qualifies as of the emacs -Q type. martin