From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to control where frames get created? Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:06:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5BB23807.2080507@gmx.at> References: <20180929183701.0b49b97d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB081FC.8030704@gmx.at> <20180930101435.7b834510@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB10C49.1030106@gmx.at> <20180930143534.24d54ac5@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB1DC44.2090902@gmx.at> <20181001070643.0c0afc09@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538406492 8494 195.159.176.226 (1 Oct 2018 15:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Perry E. Metzger" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 01 17:08:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6znr-00028c-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:08:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39100 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6zpy-0000wc-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6zms-0007cu-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6zmn-0002MW-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:42867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6zmm-0002ML-Qb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCtLD-1fxtFK3Tut-009eq8; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:06:49 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCtLD-1fxtFK3Tut-009eq8; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:06:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20181001070643.0c0afc09@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UeXDBP8g8HnUmSpU8wzxmUTSFJK806uL2UMHZlvyOQsLqoOq5pT gr+ojW7aktkM9fAPpXAgAVtXZxChKgHmqtc/LuqzMCwM1zq5Inr+FOZk62p2T+1heMR7G82 vGsmfdUt8riTTjn0lm9B2KNMSp9mS/fzo5Opv0u0+TmSQ2Cbl/c3mxV8gEu8XJAjGbXhJ98 x+JfANYmU2noag0EIEghw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6gyyWfNjhAc=:LFjdikzIhOKBMMnUa9BfEA 24gPuvCUaRerxLyqJAwhBtwBu5p+UDf33y73tUJAv1LyDN2ApMoMl9D1ge58m1Da9R3dkVi7P K7aVdMMrEnb/5VovlrjZuVP0owCFwvyRUi7DaMatuLAHOFRmsgMP7Gu5oy4giCaZBYUf6rYwH vjRcZTI79yqrSZqd9PfNOisND1eDFxz5TwsefVk53fXJ5vO+C/qMz34GnZW3TNCzzdnN3Q3qR sVtpHT6WwyrDQuTTXhmYyKoEBGaZwJ9J42tybZHtqug8cW+TYUG1TLsWJWAJIqrQXlJwmitHH hQIa3BrsMMT+YMtGe1Fl3rDtPU9XUy2wicDwmhjRAahzkTOguKal2p4hjN4dw4MsMw57fXCMF oQgKqsSOt9eTiCw4iveodB4OFPxPV5XkVC7Bbt7qPYYuSVmLi1X+WbV7lFK5twSS7ZRGzlqLX ERS8oOixaDHwcXbHdrRBR1Tfj5PdLzdTha8pTKqIw4wYbvIEBJU3MKnHWKHfum30btJSOIrLZ n4Cmh9gDK92sjIsZ7OKTABAItHKS4fsAoECzqBjPeFRRfBtsNom5ruVTKIebdcUeWM/bxweZA bJJeo3MKgTaC+n2aZRSkKgIQJLG3fYLKKZvP5m1ULxnkgbZVrKRbgIXw0X5AmZG0/quyojrBX eINv6Ch6DYyRMhT8fUGZGm52CH2lo5BRAg0jNxasG/G7FWLmWeLn+s5k3sCZiaVJI43HIwbwx nHaFsenYjIn6IXK81a55oTjLKS1+FhhPao6hJcxGd9g3/pO4FL1xPPi4qLMIIXGiFTUmn1ZK X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230182 Archived-At: >> BTW the X-position 690 of your new frame is much larger than I would >> expect from 0 + 675. So this seems even more broken. > > No, that's fine. I deliberately added 15 pixels there for a couple of > reasons. (I wanted to be able to see if I was obscuring any > terminals, a thin strip of the background is good for this purpose. > It isn't a bug, I did it myself.) A pity somehow, because it means that we don't get any two pixel symmetry. If, as a rule, you always subtract two pixels for the top position of the new window, do you get always exact vertical alignment? Even with the old window at top zero? Or is there some randomness? martin