From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to control where frames get created? Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5BB10C49.1030106@gmx.at> References: <20180929183701.0b49b97d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB081FC.8030704@gmx.at> <20180930101435.7b834510@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538329598 10483 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2018 17:46:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Perry E. Metzger" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 19:46:33 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6fnc-0002aa-Bo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:46:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6fpi-0000FX-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6fp6-0000FP-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6fp3-0007TT-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:48419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6fp2-0007TL-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.160]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLunc-1g5ZtX3Fzo-007pUQ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:47:55 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.160]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLunc-1g5ZtX3Fzo-007pUQ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:47:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cPppwCW2Enz1L2Wk09IOhzH4/6fWPUwitfl7q6L5bZ9bL1Gc7Fo yZ6h+4VLBDPS31+harxdqzY/sYhlmlrfkkaQqt0eFJSLIdyYztkKo5IUn3n+V/nzUazWeGh nvTlrgzfC4ypHcFP6OPSufIjIM7XBsroXkueo3oyWCZGk0eBdfwDJ++0/4vopZZulsT08WG YYlBnGwo3XmFLGJ9kEXNQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:x9qA1uzb8XI=:IJepBO9v6m4SfPTa8sLjtw Nu2+dT1alYUXXH0n3L/vTRYeufbl06O5Mp3QljyHJ9uEPMJuuTN3iaWLV7vdVQqK+JnmOUiF3 9/Y+eWx/aNm2R1m0tc/t1kBG6MyhwIdp9p7S8WeDpVCszFyFStJ5mxyMKKjDaf0Na265/h+28 TIHq6+um8IQiaF+r3aRN4A9kVzYIBVPcTDvD3lQA7xy9saHQbDKtwK5uB+Z+AH/vYi58HOsjg kF0sHXaKDIivitJHxSCsdxYJfMur3BeBaRIW7mCSc93+ZgYJ2qcQSt6a6cNvn03bUL2kcS+h/ fOt7m/v1iQ76M1YAydvsgECCCBxupRHSulD7SDDrLARUSMlfwy8qdevULjIEH2d0dNqI0/Fq/ Fiu8l34/VqlMsAV89SDWKBvBaVRKeZAM72ijzDCDF7OLxzx1cTESyy6+2AEvArbV1H/BcEPxC 54YeqLUUUJtGyRtCQrVkNzMq8dlQlgLzIljQi+jC0qgp7ZYgPrgmzCTgQgoMvUjnaFVPnqHU2 Z5zQvATiptENGsrHOleLaaKmka+03iA410yf+Eh1bl8AcywwTbQ3XOKFosLAiQtsHSLdwcya/ EPGFifaOEWhoHspyLM1zEN2rZ8v13Ho7Mf2Jo0evscftC5bLNjDjWaw45/ro0rWwqgad2J/c3 n1nsL+1DfyRI8CILf/4sKmlPoNbPPu5fZxoOG359RHRV7ZbQVyktEquD++cQf7sotebaxSpIu Abp763iZ+2rZ/sWX0d+UPpURhXYYGN5CpQ77KRXxj/OKbvWAer9ZNax9Ir/RAZYGzux8jJ0X X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230173 Archived-At: > Actually, it is _almost_ perfect. For some odd reason, the new window > ends up a few pixels lower than the old. I can fix this with some > subtraction but I'm puzzled why setting top to (cdr (frame-position)) > isn't quite doing the right thing. What are the values returned by 'frame-geometry' for the old and the new frame? Which window manager do you use? Which toolkit? martin