From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggesting `frame-split-biggest-window' Re: customize location and shape of a new window in a frame Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:17:13 +0200 Message-ID: <5B9CC009.1040603@gmx.at> References: <9755.9843.306611.23448@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87y3c7pw4w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h8iuik3g.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87o9d2eaql.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <875zzawbd6.fsf_-_@moondust.localdomain> <5B9A1599.2060800@gmx.at> <87musl9x31.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <5B9B723E.9080707@gmx.at> <87y3c4yq4i.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1536999335 8207 195.159.176.226 (15 Sep 2018 08:15:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 08:15:35 +0000 (UTC) To: Eric Abrahamsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 15 10:15:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g15jm-00023I-KK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:15:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g15ls-0006He-5U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g15li-0006HZ-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g15le-0002u3-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g15le-0002jq-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 04:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLelb-1g1v711cYt-000pQc; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:17:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y3c4yq4i.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Cmy36kTY2X6vRVlVOP1HUFRixahdDhPXgKdWaZbAMwgjJhJEs3o vYMmEEkk+13hjEbVQrH9xdP7jaMXICkXPwH060PQgAtmnkasm7zZULSIgXeONRxf21XbcA8 FK8SFYSLOr//U5UuwAZUmd4zT3PUgdNXr5SbbWJYzL9PB9FTQ5CxiV/Tm5FlLgiX3Om7NKz GX5nMxEKr7uOq91gGGYhg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:nPRmZ3T197A=:RFr2omImsq5YQgC2t9cScB Cj/kj73HC6rC7HhomUXhD8WMexn2RDgUHS19fOEPNtK2XnPzJEe2RIK5PqBMlu83yNPblXZQa YhHAIOtoDCq5kPpmCCPA/Ffl3lCpHykYTnD6T0qujESefoa3sVglsSOgiOUeYJmGQ0tIerzCl J8VcDau5DRPHEYNmmYxTQxrbtroRJ3tJX38pGhupHgCaG+iOaJsiGP0WIMyC4ybp3eFNSWV8M s9uggQtSHMIKSeCa6AF7dc3PSowhA/G3M2WWwm96wyyjN0jXSUFl3hLJYkH+xj/hYH+abhFuy ZDyi8qL4wI9hBANNspRE7cV7mS5zBqSobZdgqxdof9qUK4AKpV4gDtt73gBs8w/h5K2ZdzS51 hTeamnrmV4Y0O78mxVq7km2V5rPmK093VeevBUBi2IP/B2/wBsfaQUAIIZPM0EVpgN0CuBaY6 fIM8e9JNs3ayZ7RepZLnhAE/v//WedHwLMnh1PctHZ+L/UIul39qNPBgvHvuLyEPI+brV9I4y MhfDBRJ6p5A1Tz8teu3LLC93P9KKeM+BIC324LY4BVfptCD65U9Oaz+UMehwApd9dGz7r3e+j EtVAqQOaDEnK1oq/QGhVH8KA9KFzFh+dUAWjla7HvJ11VCj8DiZgHH0LXV4rl2HEmxfP2NLh9 bAt2MsmEbvJqkxSTPPnnNPViuNBjjwJeI39NN+XBOEkjKuGC/vVcgkysDl25HL8iIL+MYje1L a9m7NYUwbC6LnXffKtP9+MpxPQQdif3txNI8XwMutKFbsZ29iVRtBrSnJMVwDTm6mn+OsZ4n X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:229806 Archived-At: > Huh, thanks for the background. But in my experimentation, at least, > side windows seem to work perfectly well (especially in combination with > atomic windows). Is there any particular reason not to use them? Hopefully not. They should work well, even if not perfectly. martin