From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A?= bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9ARe:_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9Abug#31745:?= Frame's bug whenwindow-system Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:33:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5B349D71.3090301@gmx.at> References: <878t7pms1e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2lho3cg.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CB9B3.1000600@gmx.at> <87r2ky2852.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2E077E.7070907@gmx.at> <871scsr4bj.fsf@gmail.com> <5B34962C.6050408@gmx.at> <871scrpbap.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530174790 17788 195.159.176.226 (28 Jun 2018 08:33:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31745@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=88=98=E5=8A=9B=E9=93=AD?= To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 10:33:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSMT-0004Wy-O6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:33:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSOb-0003Pb-1g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSOR-0003PE-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSOM-0002Mw-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSOM-0002M4-BO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSOL-00076L-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31745.153017485727239 (code B ref 31745); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2018 08:34:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSNd-00075G-AW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:38315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYSNa-000751-L1 for 31745@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.19]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbgyV-1g1llw2FdD-00lAoq; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:34:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871scrpbap.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dpfo3c4MgTTeuTd2mohq7CtnvBFv/TpvurSXI5Sty2DSmX5R/vU VbBXvezf6NQoBaAAFGM2u3c8Q/0efCLKh99O+4WaiWKapCvSPaCVN5hhGBDU2zaqcbvlvP+ odOwDaYkzDxEWGPoTbOnieemdbebAmFbWU62aAKOdAbbzIuppCyh7yu5qU1aoewI511E1mp fRs1JvyrDy+yjoSiJjlmQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QuRkfmqT1s4=:hGq1KogqaLQJdnnbtEZOE5 vQquZLgFr7wO/mXjnZMlB3lvl+KW95gNJ+c75aRn2Pge9kGOuMSMMqftcY27ziP++5YQ5BwaS TnYxGQnvoqISD4Edyh9gmDH1Qyr3aNCygYXYTnUcc8CM7/uKev7NyHDS8ymBNIiaWKv2fvaUL nC6sDbByuA2wVKiSUaBflfntFb+fKxBqVkoz7ohAmL1bQ/vfBxB+U/LV7+458f30XwmNwyHTc W+MZ2E05c1JakzoROXGdHx6S0Ar+cByGuFmKcuqu/IM2ZfzqaU06md6M0vZirjm/632MJqv4E hRsxnSnxgc3K8z6uEKCBGhs/EmgXajCAaeBOBpOVyR5GScI9yDOjtyy48XNyX4vLHgdCJZjOH 17afLlMRQSDD23QcUFV9xNUGvQGKM1GEg2z5wIiF2h9psMM2iGogHGPXk4clJZh0jck2/Gsps kMA6w/MjuErNopa9G68nC5sB31B90F5twUujETbkCR7KIXcdXVzL4dhzQdhlxocNMHdMYxtDN WTgo677gWD4skB6T08Zscm0qQLhQ04+JOqp6J5oU2BL8qFzkllk7ctCSGP/kmijN61P7RZu5b so6P4doJFFdqcm9/MJnuBlgGyA9AGATIAQaCqFq22Q31kGZ1ANt6+GqRkSei9B3unjZ2u+k9P REiPGmUtONorvJYethGz5LvTQAPCDUz1gishbPFV73RE4zdpdsOFSswVG8WXDMv5YZfX0vqw6 OpU3ryxFAo8IIucly5pccZZIHCsswu7eKywXJi0MgMtttJ8kAp6/VwaOeznM0MUJk8HQOwQ8 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147896 Archived-At: >> Hmmm... Does the behavior reproduce just with >> >> emacs -Q --eval "(setq default-frame-alist '((left . 0) (top . 0) (wi= dth . 130) (height . 56)))" >> > > Yes. That's a good bad base. Let's stick to this. >> Also, when you evaluate >> >> (setq default-frame-alist '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 130) (heigh= t . 56))) >> >> in such a miscreated frame does it turn to the expected state? > > No, and I don=CA=BCt see how it would, that just affects the next fram= e > creation, no? Besides, it=CA=BCs already set to that :-) I'm too silly. I obviously meant (modify-frame-parameters nil '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 130) (height= . 56))) What give (frame-pixel-width) and (frame-pixel-height) for this frame in the bad and good states? > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.9, running KDE plasma 5.12.5, > using kwin. Basically Ubuntu 16.04 with KDE on top. Can you try with another toolkit or X without any toolkit so we can tell whether this is GTK or window manager specific? martin