From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: modify-frame-parameters with floating point offsets Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:59:56 +0200 Message-ID: <5AC5C96C.6090201@gmx.at> References: <5AC3232D.1020107@gmx.at> <874lksy9vy.fsf@gmail.com> <5AC35626.2070700@gmx.at> <877epowjq9.fsf@gmail.com> <87fu4c9sci.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <5AC483FC.4080401@gmx.at> <874lkr4aio.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522911505 18322 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 06:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 06:58:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 08:58:20 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f3yqf-0004al-Pe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:58:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ysj-0001Lg-NW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 03:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ysY-0001Kn-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 03:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ysS-0006WY-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 03:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:51243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ysS-0006Vk-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 03:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.100]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOfx8-1f7r1M31D4-0065um for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:00:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874lkr4aio.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9ZJ6DWqBuEhqKpPibau9bWvo/SydJ4pYhk/T99kGIpdut3joDfY +ghq5m5tD6BP+hDxsTL5YcWzvziHw0wLJ/VVoRCDiFHYSzZl8eIu2moUCloTDx0kdcyhEcG WDYzK/ocSnB9SoolqMOZX9LdlTLkOrxy/RrhsAEoUp47H0yqEHwe+wk9R63Bc0noUVpqC+t yWquQ6vYjT5+2N/2xxJCg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:pMqn4CYs70M=:c/6ZrECi1mezlwKKZzLIhf K8e7BGK2VDgPkbFbJw7O2NDZxTf7rjNyBcp62LRu0OCieueupDfARkgvXJUgQBWyn4wNMUoKt /4IwlOfw2XThcBgS9rkcRR5kNENeA8SmPPGyER9yoi8n/8Q0j9PLRAXasudPm9Hlnj9rDy+qQ Fw4S9eDdoY6OeeD5tVyXUQntxBcG50W/UtNqJduKqtFQHDnYHsYy4CDbbCyj5dTs7s4c0DjfB ljJeki2Q9eAZrrJYAAHPV0UWw2pVL0Cl02FomxCfhGogBgxTkXXAH0nqgaAWrV1U3zdxys3Nv fKHtnm0nwq5PKXklXV4GSylpYShZmUEVQH3DUIElSaMGEl2Aq4QqzEdj1ZsZ7AMwUkkea6gJF WuDng6P45PJLs7mbg87zbLHdsRtrx1JikS7QGAmReUg2UN8DYJxrzhZ952isTWu/zQyoqr3fQ pxlolN0XPU/Ep9e4VaRz7uLdoNNHKEYd37NCoHM+FVZdTwT8yOIlrDx6pUEkd0jNdCVCJkEXV lkJ9KGCNSAphcgmSOM+KkkCTruHKFWIETddtjlRCzAJFO8ybDdubnQiID+QaKs/zl5CDiScxq +hsEl8oSMTT0R0swTyhucAnHRkwVD6QvEEi0AhJNnN2n46cBf2TufnW3fE1ikhZqlKiMUisDW GKvpznphOOkvwP7oSaYSGp9yavHzGcZqkAbFeJtjKuysCBJUrE7wFd0ZU647LuVQXOMUnk8+K 7zUoUujOyCbQ4++tM6dCU235eriZBTex3ZVwrDmzMeoNNHxQOsdjGerhbDt8xS+3Zu5691Vf X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224360 Archived-At: > No, the left external border is very small. It=CA=BCs certainly not 20= > pixels wide. Then it's possible that your window manager tries to optimize things in various ways without telling you the whole story. I can imagine that if an external border is usually 20 pixels wide, a window manager might decide that showing the entire border on the edge of the display is of no use and move the window to some negative position. I would dislike such behavior because it would make it virtually impossible to orderly tile the screen. In either case you would have to look at the sources of your window manager to tell what it really does. martin