From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-26.0.91: switch-to-buffer-other-window runs too slowly (about 0.1s) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:16:52 +0200 Message-ID: <5AB94724.1020609@gmx.at> References: <83efk6g93z.fsf@gnu.org> <544b8346-bda9-45eb-9573-1d51d9f768b2@Spark> <83bmfag8gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ie24z1.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8m23tc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1ty22p1.fsf@gmail.com> <837epyg30w.fsf@gnu.org> <83370mg0qj.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB94021.8080700@gmx.at> <83vadiek9y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522092613 8695 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2018 19:30:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 21:30:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Xom-0002Bw-H7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:30:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Xqp-0000gN-W0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XcC-0003jG-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XcB-0001os-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:33495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Xc7-0001mC-0O; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.66]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LabZr-1eHtO10LYV-00mKEK; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:16:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83vadiek9y.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:n3S9RGMXisO6iU7lj5qI7037SkUNHLOV2LA6t9WgbLva7uA1Yjg Fl5HszGr7BlbuxHZn68tEFOFaX4Dd0XdwWQHdDjzG8ZKGo83gn9gdHeicVgkx9K/cnaoS+/ Y9Zi573aO/ZOoIbFM0sAHnliO2wWwo03e53/TLhFEf4gq0z7O86icru1WMzxSBLZns3wVxE 5717SjlKMQ4ki4Mz88lUA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:p/7IXSBEE3M=:VULop9nE2HZSCKqXVgYlFu 93dXtwshrnliYSUaW8h1vDJOofpdPlQoTQeF5Nt5fSsrdUUfd/8k6EmdeW4nYjOrnOT8bxw/v WZxYkI2DTgCFP17BPgHhwDXFIHyg2t+/V01c2/rCIP3OUoYt+Cd6EUyulwrD0J7badgdZSyFt qx7pdVEVdgOLqEteC5Tn1AHUC6fKYIcNW7G6Tw8/WaePyq6ZvtAsHyWCsMobvZtQ2j//jep6D 59WgGxe851jee37Dor9ADIA0i1ptNlhIfJYnXl7ss2yCasLgV7NLUhTf11TEFzsgaqVKZ2FJt fzS0K+0SDHjpIsV0F3PK0Vv6pj8qT/eg6dHWwbpruZb2ZXT3S3+5Hp7LnVySHZxOLvSH8MkbD N17+pp6MKz+6/hNXo82Xnvt+PtvHpQpu/lP9S952xRNrpGSTYZlojUk2BuKK1Ke1r1E0Kzi+B DnRJSyJWsiPz+HEEH8knpxqmEvH8+BfMSPt+j+d4axl0kDh6KLyin+eTgExP/Y6VLqk7p6AE0 rM+7XTH8B4ux0HlBxvuoUcRdJP098f9MUtTBHMt3xAATjeN0lvNZrgdBJIsAup3rZAkb6PllX 5ziChzxXobetuzyzIBicTnRN5zz4TblEHa+cq7wI54jp6EVJqXHNYsjO8KKLbiZ90I1FqQO1M UTW0KsEAL2g3ZIPQ13dP4ywMekA9em80U3d5OADXj7Qk6dxXNR5+eU1II4IvLu0A1O0POzNiQ DHh5watWwDedkau/JSHQ9GBYR+ORMpAIyq+jQe8DBrm1hsxRxuPpnkob1RzMFgBAKaRWAXBy X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224069 Archived-At: > You mean, FRAME_VISIBLE_P is not reliable in your GTK Emacs? Yes. See also the thread starting here: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-02/msg00133.html martin