From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Shrinking mini windows to one pixel height Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 12:28:19 +0100 Message-ID: <5A9A86D3.3070201@gmx.at> References: <5A9A658A.5080207@gmx.at> <83d10lv4ko.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520076422 26357 195.159.176.226 (3 Mar 2018 11:27:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 11:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 03 12:26:58 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1es5JW-000653-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 12:26:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39703 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5LY-0005aQ-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:29:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5L1-0005Yr-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:28:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5Ky-0001F1-IQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:28:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:34837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5Ky-0001EF-8Y; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:28:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.117]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHokD-1erGWZ1YR3-003dkj; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 12:28:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83d10lv4ko.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BzZnx1nEes7ueoDefWMMO+b+FAA5Ip1SC/C4CoqrvWkWNUBoFJy OH4Hr0RlS2d3UZKjf6LKjOA97QoNp0q90sOaiVscNcwa0UK21K1/quMezVlWcvafdKEjda0 XNc6FbzMQMHmKYw3mAWtbTaFT+EozKE09DwMZpafuWArPc6YL9uGQyFPQTsaSHRhxzUfWAH feobq7gbIUEadFON3ABgA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hWIap4hsPUY=:fdzIoqB7cAXlYPmVsvZ0Qu Ns39ZA+u/iOwEZeDapx1sbe9bz5UR65GePs7JxzbqFLY13kvzInVEU58JV+76BLhbJSDE6t4J LDrgEBI0d1oV7Wmmpy004XnwK1Fp9hUxIKRcqVNZztehVz60YLRjcwiGg8xUuT9Yc/rEnZq11 +jDcC5ewrO/v5GpUYV7UvjghGcf/+4QLhzNMg9GTOg0jE4cOCTxhsABFAM6cCQ8b+S9yfM3qC hvKWBoV42ECXyaAH6slVqPFtbGYhXxlnliKMOt6Ccec1zJXBHmo4GsmvFuOQDKjxD0smbM0k/ jX0LhUZNw3r0k4MWNleX6t169qFia9MqBOWB3xKekHYTAbUGWyD8wuBc/jAJtfjx4vVlLzsGy LVjg7cROztQwdni03jeMXZ/Q/r48IKQkxnr5GgFPktxCMzh2a1BUp/8hv0vwBdSvbJhq9/8Gk +BNpxXudMe2ZEaidw1+9/J06RMRrTtvpwEIP27HeDRAyTuXTNGCqrQuWR1h0+p06tFWKEHdrJ qxdIk2SozGNQgNenF5F0u3OT2ZQY75DsS3iDILATMse1ToW16wwQZoQ34lAdso+QezH6gJgpY jUejigNaFz9JKBpNzB0tGVUXHUF69V49ijyVCDest8WzJ4eUnP5rkeqhM59MzjajD+ef1lPpf eCv9Vf/rVrd2VHNwXmspSWZRkmCLTj7IjjLob64xoRdo/aOKw1nhR7JkEWkE61OvuaY0Im+3p fc2gFOlUfDN4GtXZ7zgt6sC8nv3XCuvP3VOPCEhO8M3TGDi08bImmJVZllQhW8nKbs0fH5X4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223234 Archived-At: > Does the capability or making a mini window 1-pixel tall cause us any > trouble? If not, I'd prefer not to block it, let alone do that on the= > release branch. Fine with me. > If you feel strongly about disabling this by default, on behalf of the= > innocent and the na=C3=AFve, I could agree with a defcustom that would= do > that. Maybe. So let's wait for an innocent or na=C3=AFve to speak up. > In any case, limiting this to frame-char-height sounds too harsh to > me, because using a suitably selected font one could produce quite > legible text in the mini window of a significantly smaller size. > E.g., AFAIR sizes as small as half that don't even trigger > reallocation of the glyph matrices, because their original allocation > tolerates up to twice as many screen lines as determined by the > frame's default font. Ideally we would remember the pixel height of the first text line and never shrink it to anything less than that. martin