From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it possible let child-frame not hide the mode-line and minibuffer out Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:05:11 +0100 Message-ID: <5A757B47.8020502@gmx.at> References: <87po5ngz9x.fsf@163.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517648629 533 195.159.176.226 (3 Feb 2018 09:03:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 09:03:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Feng Shu , Emacs-Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 10:03:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ehtjO-0007Q2-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:03:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60046 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehtlP-0000FG-FO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 04:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehtlA-0000Ce-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 04:05:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehtl7-00063T-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 04:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:61949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ehtl7-00062h-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 04:05:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.73.116]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbPza-1fB8i22KYk-00kzYH; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 10:05:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87po5ngz9x.fsf@163.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pS5p99m8jKrSG4A7oNBf9D+Vd1Vy724RmaY61k+lpqBbRJHnPx1 +6ydi6zITy1WZnL62S21PP1h+RXov7x0PhCG5OPqcGnpfWxOMlKkNr8dEjvM+S7ShBmwGE4 ofx7JMIWn51VaOHarWU0YgWmMbS7uS4MD6ecSBqhM5Sg/Ui2jhOcGj9YnlTc/aJJP8OEcDi y46sJxO3FjTEeT7NdNqAQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hvkcHsj/BIs=:t5MYO6NcEzEKjEzIWqCmU9 mZhsXsIVbPL51aXA4+vY59WnzdC1XMz4Qp6xhR5+aYUxr6ObPqoYsjTYtYvYMOusaqDmoVgw9 cJyMGq6SRmpt2YRtClaFcDCiwqAS5ZrMCvZGbMnYtM3J20syFciIvO+CA1RURqReguV+3m9LS tfVFj136z0YMrFDiHFEy6t+9JJKckd6gWjlAaHbqZ/pDtODzgi+KNa4yUIJmCyfrNhptTaaBb 4AHSCYuXaNkAIRvQ/agepIac9U+AvVhBzESg9CHruHg2nHSVEpFyNWnb4UUX95tm1Pe8x+69q grhWfuW+/jcd0fbTLmAs0d7CkAbjl1OnKdiUhv3LwBbJz0Nxc+FKXLs0747pOb4J1lwNODEhn ZV+lmGmilxuonOamgX0r32MOY/GPjHDKMuh1XN3LbT6G4+uVymEtu1vY189Wk4Oy8SoNC4r9O xx73ZEWW2IfyC8CSJPif0xQ5VE7l0EpExxFImURDhO7tgFJk/OHOMuo+S4dpCfsln5OKt+G3H ILgoh+gg9BSVBekZnFQMGJtk9Z2Q2vLm84TfwCles/OY4x/GZ0cBiL4HNATELKJfSsECDgV7g pBPL28+ibchnzU+nPR43/sCyz9AZKJaaAV0pClr8C6GcNWzPoFaY7/pS0Tg6AD4qObECzxUnL O6quNVoum3xLrR6JkiULgRqkBF+wAEYNxoh3DcqPE0M6gQ7tKrCJ7BDiew7hZ4K5SQ2DakGs+ nuFXjVF8DXp5viYpgQ8riea5joNh2r3tJTrwUQQdi9tU0jl/dckkCisNMhol37C+fVWy2dSb X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222462 Archived-At: > When a child-frame move to position (-1 . 0), it will hide its > parent-frame's mode-line and minibuffer, is it possible let child-frame > auto move above a little, and let it not hide its parent-frame's > mode-line and minibuffer? I'm not sure why a position like (-1 . 0) should do that - did you mean (0 . -1)? But what is "auto" move? Positioning and sizing of child frames is completely left to the caller with one exception: When the parent frame is resized, the child frame may have to be resized and repositioned too. IIRC we try to do that proportionally so it's possible that the parent frame's mode line gets obscured. Is it that you had in mind? martin