From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30182: Update Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5A702D3B.2070004@gmx.at> References: <87k1wdqc4q.fsf@gmail.com> <87inbxqc1l.fsf@gmail.com> <5A631B7F.3030308@gmx.at> <878tcs3j23.fsf@gmail.com> <5A634E53.7010205@gmx.at> <87mv182bzk.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7x7sww6.fsf@gnu.org> <87efmj27d5.fsf@gmail.com> <83vafvqjbf.fsf@gnu.org> <87inbvxdz8.fsf@gmail.com> <5A65AB97.1030401@gmx.at> <87po62kk10.fsf@gmail.com> <831sih23rh.fsf@gnu.org> <5A663490.3050409@gmx.at> <87r2qh5lya.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6C37A7.2020309@gmx.at> <87r2qag5wp.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6D8947.5010207@gmx.at> <83k1w0irux.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517301036 22794 195.159.176.226 (30 Jan 2018 08:30:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 30 09:30:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egRJ4-0004x6-R5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egRL5-0005rQ-ND for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egRKp-0005nZ-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egRKl-0006Uf-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40631) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egRKl-0006UV-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egRKk-0000Ts-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30182.15173010671769 (code B ref 30182); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2018 08:31:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egRJq-0000ST-Dm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egRJn-0000RT-Kl for 30182@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:31:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4nt7-1exQJI2jLZ-00yuie; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k1w0irux.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aKydLlKjcX1hGV+3PeYIZ5ouIoqLci22VjsvkRjt6KnmppbfvIn 5yiO9gjvhCrSc3nrxs4PGUkWOQZgL4qGYURmVFJiGT+HjRl2LdsohfvPt0UXtJ0jSZ+1rb+ mbahSQp+DhGfmW5VfdtDCgSmvQ0aPvXLpVVJX+J+adKR3aJg5CD6GLbi1bkcyDlaVrWKdg9 D+EuuHXomnVbsbWj/Vp2w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0atVwfcMpiM=:JQ9uqO9hjDqob6/OV/epm6 n8YHjjvMhIedF/JT8xTJqLof5x7KAyZpPO9g0T51Ohzmp4QJhk/MIiwlFG2kUm8e0hx5LA7h3 sSVpf/hhxZ8Uk2YU/e8PlnRDun887cfzrNBo+YmRFHf9+T+Y+4WaTV5RfMdXeLqFGWO4/G7Yx NH9z+hNwEoBX2kuW/nOJ+MHJns4RkMi87XAEp57VkFj2puObRpMGDdZHTdAEf0xHkg+rpjmA2 0JEYvCjNgA0XkK8ajX/XJhosDtXwbukG0Xm9xzCiNF/kosiYLxGMkbOYeIgCMvce0bxbm+AoJ VXgSu6T5BB9Lf8tRgpSz3dN+TDGrnmD182hlBe93wiXmn3fl79bm0C+TLHeACICn6te4Ru4VL GkVGj5xdmytG3b6uziN0fWTyDamCdR+pLdEb6cwXem3snMywFZKqOSXZfvZIgnWb/4n0yxTpg eva/p8g1ChR6RwXJwLYUgeVdySfAPvg+NtnC1BT8613+6D9/0epcE/6mDgCk2UdNGskSS9slc 2OlXuf/snpfppRzcDE5bJj6YMOQaPnYOBUe0rKfLw7LrL9m85TOvpQE2zJwBgUR2H+Etob9sD EoaMG9qhktZ9gnUfEoV72JZwSOpNMJFFbT+Dqnj6tPsVX/33iTdEbvWp7X3V9HCnC/pAym+2s 5B8Iw3mLdkmMUJQruNVy3m8pOMDkfVRFoDe4sSKRu9hllbxAkcEFknSBNLSGtNkZkNBUeFiFj yoEqftXH3zjGIFDr0D8J2rX7smdnBb2xTgHIaxtlM0xz8T7x7AxHhVBErgHuq4t1bvnn9b+I X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142685 Archived-At: > Btw, if using window-at-side-p is so much more efficient than > window-in-direction, then how come the former is not documented in the > ELisp manual? Should it be? I'm not sure. So far `window-at-side-p' is only used in `window-in-direction' and to quickly tell whether a mode or header line can be dragged ("quickly" because that doesn't check for whether windows have fixed size or are already to small to get resized). It's not internal (not called `window--at-side-p') because it's called from mouse.el Also, `window-at-side-p' could check arguments better as evaluating (window-at-side-p nil t) shows. martin