From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix some tooltip related problems Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 20:06:17 +0100 Message-ID: <5A53C129.6040007@gmx.at> References: <5A533FA4.4030507@gmx.at> <83tvvw6vce.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515438288 14033 195.159.176.226 (8 Jan 2018 19:04:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 19:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 08 20:04:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYciu-0002vl-CC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 20:04:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYcks-0004I7-Dw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:06:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYckh-0004H7-NO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:06:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYckg-00069c-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:58336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYckb-0005ys-6w; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.13]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1iGk-1erg6H1rvm-00tgWE; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 20:06:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83tvvw6vce.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EwyM9SJUfe6p6qOAXy23C2k9fpvna/TcgP5CBs5bBCkU/UKxYlE FXFAPLn0cRBEjdkB5q3NSyaCZ7avJtfw3CrifYsbn4yQLVzuFswQzjBin/RZ8nfc3m7/TG8 j85ex1SZXvLqTU4Ad/2FYlVV8jSGnGY4UI1QsET7I+/fFV25tr3hwnSa4CJb680BUfe40Ns nih8SvWGohemWndYZ9EBw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ky8bwoMHzqQ=:a2DzCyg14klzbQdZTDmVqE Dw3iHe6BKo3dfjrOQOQCycco/PMM1XKb4HiEkHcWIzG7T6w6NeO3yvJmIGKfXo8JcMzXjsv43 9Pf68Hk7nf5/fNQo/LT/yb7iv2KqNVptV6RJhpwMGM+u1P15Bef1J02r1sTk/82Ltj5GPxlZ9 HuEl5O7PecE/8v6s0Y1ZsWhmvUL6+qxZwkDCg5yP/LcPJRVjqoMSanf8fXdZOw3munUZledBI LNs/4p2R+2IxFRgrXfsVQ4dx4beCC7ciummQEz0wBUdk1gzmzg6DmAfJSlJ8XLGk8etvVZmL/ Nt63ytSqjRFuyzVg/In9figEk4wrDPXNwEBNh1o9/mMa832UN/bnRGvphXChiK09vxjDCtPcZ nqtqDO4PL/HkZF2WP8MceATsQMq+CZkdfj6rsCem5jiLEyR/CK2EhzE55DgWTnD85v5H0A6vk 2h5qcyb7xY92CXMINkF1fyOuyMGhTRiOMUw+IFVisr+nzxwiYUEkKM/tKxHVbwInxThP1RSiP w/kH2SXSq8BUcHNY2Rv3dmhA1z6zVvrx5TTyCpPZmXS0MoGpt7uCOiHl4ndz2U3RUeul/2aCw 8ByV6Zx0XCc6ilfokhKwopjvUYJaGhJC4kZCC7/uNOLYkAS7864FFcVGJ1YB11QwlBQLx2oYi 9MhW7ZgaPZqM3CpK5EPrv1yvodUnMDrA3Z5sUcW3IfRr5VLahpCsGvoMRurLJbzqgaljw6MIM IdhMtAPDXBM3UzRa5EXKzQ5S9oZXRhiUi+ZPI4+cBfy9iq0zeYZ49iRFFjh5beUcryNzVWXW X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221721 Archived-At: > What would that do to Lisp code that was probing that frame parameter? > I think for backward compatibility we should pretend in > frame-parameters and frame-parameter that this parameter still exist, > at least for tooltip frames. > > IOW, remove it only for internal bookkeeping. How about adding it to `tooltip-frame-parameters' then? martin