From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-drag-and-drop-region Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <5A0B360D.60908@gmx.at> References: <5A0ABD41.5040402@gmx.at> <83po8kkd5n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510684241 30880 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2017 18:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tak.kunihiro@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 14 19:30:37 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfyj-0007Vd-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:30:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfyr-0000XQ-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:30:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfy4-0000XL-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:29:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfy0-0002VZ-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:29:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfxv-0002So-Vp; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.11]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJFBe-1eBvsV3qgc-002qMc; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:29:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83po8kkd5n.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YBexotEBN846ETcx1DIiEwauOmNrDmOkhp4hGLEbr4S3eTQLZSf jP61Xv3XJDSbv+n7BAYDIUnv90lxJQ/PNuIYDSxCXPQtKlZJ2dIXIHU2vkLr31eR01evQ/w A6zmKSBQFGf7LjkSksfwNuYf/Rcqq5alMMMW1qpw+TMPG1HiRIwlqRb0A0WWLs58NLtW14p jkFSViiQqJYdPk1SBUS1Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kn49WaJu2Nc=:F8JHT4rooknpVQnjcWE+0D Ya0ieSEjW5CJPR5+tMNQ5yzH/mSDsGO1YdXgDoWoFJo7ItMYph4VJECCpVPJSdP8XAb0RvOcD a9GZoEizklTbREA4WMRsJlosQbQYUaMhuvlNw5w3ICXJT8XFd5vi0GJL1TsyOpGZQ0qNmElH6 Br6RRNszcJri7NUleJYJzVYqDCKCumd9b7zkZDEpWVO5YDm00Tk3gwEoSYLxTZOExHkyPKYFN AllGKeNDPzOhhcxV14AZhfkTZ6E9koevj3rgpcMOGPo4hMFxKhy0zVO/BIZDf/NHjFC9Jor0m iiSen/IarXHdYA6OiI8/W4F5vbmXi+tdOoZcY+DHbXUU1JmSzMSFqlWZ9O1MzV5p3bmTesT8m r17SrfAl5SWgQ+5YAx84HMRKXojHmWUcEhnxpSiJ8HDCeKmqUN28t/3rwT5U38Cnyw0+yUYs1 UspDyON1C522B8u3DbbYHab0XDkTZs51/uNotF06k6Uxq1ygt/BoAGHRro3BdCM/pnVgUCEM5 cgyeYzygtu9thCcF1eRU/KD3R8lgwhitqcHqq4es6atPVdyyme1Ms3W0Pgi6qB2JJgAAvrASx SBUe+ax1p+XRBai7QWrmduQmQXnvwOUrraNAAL0zGCq0GMEpHO9ppH3JfXgHZon3WsuZlG1vU 7c9E8KiK3BqWITOiDL9DnO/SPM3+LVUR2KNpjWDX0n7+uaFxhyKg0mq0FiwGehTu8xBHx/Dvr OYoo7ayKUlZhv2VVc5L8LpAA3P3sskvMtICu+D5KBx73authtrCDMTuz8QZMzt/lIKxk4Y1g X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220191 Archived-At: >> (8) Read-only text should be handled. An attempt to drop text into a= >> read-only area should be signalled to the user. An attempt to = cut >> text from a read-only text/buffer should be signalled as well. > > For the latter, we copy text instead (cf C-w in read-only text). So I= > think this feature should behave similarly, at least by default. I just noticed that the code does use =E2=80=98kill-region=E2=80=99 alrea= dy. This has the side-effect of putting the text into the kill ring, something which should be documented at least. But I think the code should rather use =E2=80=98delete-region=E2=80=99 instead with the behavior you proposed. martin