From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:10:52 +0200 Message-ID: <59e05a4c-2197-304a-8da5-d9c13f9a9077@yandex.ru> References: <22239.6546.544495.576771@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <88256367-3f1d-6dda-a509-d89e3c8e6c28@yandex.ru> <22239.36324.478948.721025@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83y49qlbam.fsf@gnu.org> <272376b7-ad78-a16d-ceeb-d7408fb59fdb@yandex.ru> <83oaaml57e.fsf@gnu.org> <2823a513-de6a-2c99-fc06-825efb1f0be0@yandex.ru> <83io0ul2vb.fsf@gnu.org> <2c9b9fe9-4df0-1ba2-123d-ab4743bf49ca@yandex.ru> <83ziu5jv92.fsf@gnu.org> <83egbhjc1v.fsf@gnu.org> <7471846c-3ea0-f05f-23b5-deec649c89d5@yandex.ru> <83lh5ogn2h.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457784747 27172 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2016 12:12:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22947@debbugs.gnu.org, rogers@modulargenetics.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 13:12:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiP0-0003BS-9F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:12:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiOw-000721-An for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:12:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiOs-00071w-9g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiOo-0004oi-9d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiOo-0004oY-5v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiOn-00049j-Vn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22947 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22947-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22947.145778466315906 (code B ref 22947); Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22947) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2016 12:11:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiNr-00048U-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:36265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiNp-000480-GK for 22947@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n186so50681851wmn.1 for <22947@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:11:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h1Ov9xatx9HvbBrofMsPspsqK04ckK3Bj8n7xeh6lHM=; b=gNFbopgsQcPS1s4e9iu5MU9ryzBETsNOoDnJboIDzX/jecwcb64on91NIcGJIVX53V FmWV9kWe8FqVcW85Uo18n16eR/cEGM/dSKn9l8Mx1eT5lFZuiGHu1wmDeiEcCQkwhqDX 9247fyq6xeFa3og+EIzRsMXcj+g2+sWzmDrU9jnt0B9d78Bw557nAul0djnVq1ptYshp 3FDS9kFxisLhyBQwxKsu2O4W2uy2zDUIvSeW1v/5fQ6krNqgDPNGwyZX/JhvTRc2hjul VabIwvbiM8BIrlXf/0F4O1nAuGiRUmSN8MrzRtPj+2GJ7NqzFuWsSCFYM0RD4/yLfAYh xZLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h1Ov9xatx9HvbBrofMsPspsqK04ckK3Bj8n7xeh6lHM=; b=CSqVeaH6w+Ly3hH7omv5h3W4u+OGcZ7HEIynzpMZO8yMa2knn7rakmsSWMvFDXqgcZ mmFtzuU9f0mEoD0vMFm7s0+40Vm7PAjBwwaGNKzIoVVvCTmTjaBvsgyn23v4cgAoIo5y yS+MT+9coZKMIAr6t5nalwqy+deuHijijpqk4GND39kHFLhZab5AZ2XKZ/UdqTqZm65V OBfLXbnXCpL+n9JpdhkDlaABWpmCfJE1CehMuexytOkYBEP8fT4r5TZH3isPH9l09Thv PtrkGRVMPpDJr/JyM/GYhdPFdS0+obzbnjnTc0plxDdGfwgE86XKKiCd9FruPWU6MoQg i4ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLkR29l9QOPUx8DCW8V5AZjey830ICv6njmgsOUuF8bd+s8RJN/fFRGuTit4VGJrA== X-Received: by 10.194.11.67 with SMTP id o3mr14550597wjb.74.1457784655690; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:10:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o16sm12979064wjr.9.2016.03.12.04.10.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:10:54 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <83lh5ogn2h.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114817 Archived-At: All right, I'm entirely lost now. On 03/12/2016 09:41 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I don't think this implies any considerable amount of work in etags >> either. I could be wrong, of course. > > I just said that etags never had these features, so we are talking > about an enhancement, not a bugfix. "features", multiple? > No, I'm just saying this is a new feature whose implementation costs > are unknown to me at this point. Just to be clear: by "new feature" here, you mean outputting both qualified and unqualified tags for C++, ObjC, Java, and Perl? If so, fair enough. >> If you've made a deliberate choice, it doesn't seem like a patch from a >> volunteer that would make a different choice is likely to be accepted. > > I've made no choices, except not to work on this today. I don't > understand why you think I'm against adding such a feature, if done > cleanly. It's almost a reason to take offense, since I never said > anything that could be interpreted as such an intent. You've made an argument that it would somehow imply supporting qualified tags for all the languages, and never acknowledged the validity of my response. I'm not sure I understand your position anymore. But anyway, there's a careful "if" in my previous message.