From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28978: 26.0; Regression: separate, dedicated `*Completions*' frame no longer has parameter `minibuffer' Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: <59F443A7.1020207@gmx.at> References: <4d0c5535-246a-4356-914f-3c8d030ba9c9@default> <59F0412F.9090206@gmx.at> <22c73180-e9a6-416f-9e28-da98d07908f8@default> <59F1957F.80900@gmx.at> <59F2ED8C.3010400@gmx.at> <31caab4d-f332-48a7-9736-ccd172073672@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509180384 6031 195.159.176.226 (28 Oct 2017 08:46:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:46:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , 28978@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 28 10:46:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkr-0008KI-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkx-0008H4-9F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkn-0008GB-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkk-0007OH-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkk-0007OB-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8Mkj-0001aj-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28978 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28978-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28978.15091803426090 (code B ref 28978); Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28978) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2017 08:45:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8MkP-0001a9-NX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:60734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e8MkN-0001Zv-Vg for 28978@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZCUG-1droMX3tEa-00L0Am; Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:45:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <31caab4d-f332-48a7-9736-ccd172073672@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8PGLV5ulZRkD/lmcg5yrdkdrcHMJ4nKAcx3QghTcx95fRyoOIfh Z3CsaxKTp6uYFPMJ6qLrKq6WbK9wPwl2YWPex3+L4O/uczJ+FdIjJ5NkzZqNnCbWx1qBBix huQcWr29LmOAdEjAeok7+FX9L2nVy8dtfO7WJmlivIpsLpVpR0dKzd5S6DQV7Vs1WGF14hW Msod/fNDq3IaPEa3T2W1Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:7Iez0narqOA=:DmFzqd60IOkh29E3yHBSAr X51KAKJ+lGLUNAmbeK6JBmU8rOBtQPlqBn7qI6l1BT1JilitOVpqtjw5ONKH0CEEhIsFtEvyS kd/+U0fY6/kJlS7LgiMa9qLG9OiiNqoFnqChKhVc3FERwcc7MVAvLBGm7U0uWHBgZZ/85DfHn TyzVbJgBCXN048lPfGpno/6nACqkR8FddUCc8tzT523331hJbBXzY4cxDrkQbPnM1mk4pnGof SCESe/hYQYFiNbzpgzZU9BLNJhkqq8j0pVjdgIYLIqlA5O4ZYv8snf7jiAsrbybJFB+DLpqbz jm3P8cxh5qylnSdup2JFzmwQYl32W86qzuBesXW70yr7rwkQI5pcXxWhcuTWpOaFWMxrzuFl1 irQncR1JPtBe5tjBArF/cempL3wAJRQw26kI1ICIwVhxpJmvUSXzekcMz1bBXJG2W6m5v+iKX aRdsqkFrc0bpAZuJiJf2Bsmi7nFxpb6dhu8ad9gZHsH6N6mPo1+vFfiMjgh12KDYM8SOzGkYc TOCyBA/o4ps/h2UPTWjFe425M9uTUra7K/ldOmcN++Nt2/lcn0+UTp3d/Ru6tQZPMIPBZvC5M NoJemoT4tqBEsmq/vCOjWIq61eSyAezGpGJofzRW4LTs0dKcLuq2XnRkzbb3tHkznYRk/QRha ag99lBiDx/zL+U2A0jPNMnlF8q311FqEGvq1LUBMUXyWIBJa7ftoUNgMXkm2faC9pAqwPuDv9 d5BQxffhxhTJ7V0b3lVfRPngQBjnpgbTOTSW5mHtlcJ0ucZ+amPukkm0nR7SPkn3xihn+hMW X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139095 Archived-At: > So the meaning of frame-parameter `minibuffer' has changed. Not really. It should specify the minibuffer window used by that frame if the frame doesn't have its own minibuffer window. Otherwise, it's t if this is a normal frame with its own minibuffer window and 'only if it's a minibuffer-only frame. nil only serves as an initial value where it's up to Emacs to decide which minibuffer window to choose (something it eventually may have to do anyway). > I will need to adjust my code somehow. > > How would you suggest I change the test I have been using, > to detect a frame that has the active minibuffer (versus > the case I reported, where dedicated frame `*Completions*' > has no minibuffer)? I would try (eq (minibuffer-selected-window) (frame-selected-window this-frame)) It's a pity that you were not around when I tried to discuss the associated code here. Maybe together we would have found a more convenient solution. martin