From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: <59D88B8B.6050205@gmx.at> References: <59CB5D69.7040404@gmx.at> <59CE05F2.1010202@gmx.at> <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507363752 3824 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 08:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ola Nilsson , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 10:09:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAW-0000Vh-3F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:09:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAd-00059A-Ib for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAV-00058d-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAQ-0006kc-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAQ-0006kY-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAQ-00070H-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.150736373626901 (code B ref 28605); Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2017 08:08:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAK-0006zo-Lz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:08:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:65086) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0kAI-0006zZ-5v for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 04:08:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.74]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9aX9-1e9ILg0Wyd-00CzR7; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:08:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xNATYF+nUhT+JtbtPiPZqvF+MNB3b6v6OMzjhBBnr2m7p64ymAS KnZnoXLmA/2Snp5TFK0NyD1mTIUe742rYouh8U6B5hAxx5pRUAAfEOVlgEPam70eU0FOn6d OWq8IMOHm0E4nLCb1z+8uPoj21Z2cpBSrigT+bEOiCnttrlnGIGsBPgL4CpUIu/aXcYEEtO yzy3MMl7ZRoFy9Srp2rqg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:KtdbH7uUONs=:vpjUeaqaMoOW9Xc0BDg+AE urNYO8Y3QnR94rTDju5fyjPOVmCCOkjGPosNrVkDEQs2xT05AtCBX5ii1WYNisTwTJgvnAa/w fi75z7ST4V9oaqCi8S+Gjw8qEPeRAG9B5ap2GC5ctdie1dK6Y+cbU64EsZMoVs7qmnqjvDNNK zyG9pmPFWfxaw4YTjuPRhfr4XbdoK9tQ4FD9tGRDDTMIkce0LRkPcdESvt3QbtrYkFClO9xK/ wfKHKs7n6IyWMfmT3d9zUtZqYQzLedoLdjj4jlD64ExB89GAljboKsOhCKngmihfmS4HNa8Io EKTTEB/2ZIT/X4hVRHC7tW9lg2DSh/CEojGKUjMfazWWfUjLWzpV5PGQUTDIrZ9UnVB662P0g mcjF9EnnulSmGK+PM9VlnDDHucedCkWG+I8hK9gtK8IDA38+OO6U359PqZqw0JT21J84gz2Jr zWn6hRcFNYjwqyyF03yn15VEkfoS6vaSM1jGNmAHF2g4ZVc0koVn4yar/dm4L2oNe2sDc3jNm zhKnXvCg8mxgHVR7DjT4HJUDG2yDMgyV3pU59FJuMYFGQWxu3fp4YaYJTCx6AuwlCtupucX4u OKkLxFyDMZm4RwYndxLdTVUJ+fLdSmHQIpfEMautQFWnmpzZqycxI6oN/P2yJDKXhVTShUyQ+ YoTcmO2iCFYtMELGK8z9RyY1wSWyy1lFonerJUjvEFbEcIro1gfFq4hGApJZngnqxr+tCfT82 9h/NOboeFywf9TxzM74eHq4XvuxeQQAlyAKvapxWWs8ReXHWIbMOJ9okR2rkBfiBm+DywG2F X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138028 Archived-At: > Lars' HiDPI changes were a huge improvement over what was there > before. Can you tell me what Jan's first stab at scaling did and what Lars' did differently? Or simpler: How do the return values of xg_get_gdk_scale and xg_get_scale differ in practice? Because IIUC that's what these changes boil down to in the case we're discussing here. > I'm talking here only about leaving alone the x_clear_area > code, but still changing the width calculation. You mean the width of the scroll bar as it's drawn by the toolkit? martin