From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient 22 and 23 incompatibility Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 21:24:03 +0200 Message-ID: <59B1480D-DD03-419D-83FA-C3995F4B155E@gmail.com> References: <40968C64-648B-4601-89EB-6197D65E5020@gmail.com> <87d47fby7n.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85545288-C7CC-49A9-8782-483C801D635F@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A341) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249241090 29115 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2009 19:24:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Development To: Christian Lynbech Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 02 21:24:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MXgfi-00032g-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:24:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXgfi-0007Wg-AO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXgfd-0007WR-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:24:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXgfY-0007WF-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42391 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXgfY-0007WC-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com ([209.85.220.226]:34463) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXgfY-0000Vn-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so454662fxm.42 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=qOkc4HtDFT3nXquz7NBXm+EYKk1uwMvhM+fuEPrNPfk=; b=XGG4FUp7UHRCoqYtvu5oTi0izVLRYjsbl6NOye/47DapQOHBA6VG9+DqFpgdGpAewo DoARsGCB7U9Ds6ACvfNb0arLObbyZtrY8DRffX4qzgKJaDQKPXq/dJTb9Kk3Zd+tMBwf ujbfbrwsWSMXjNaF5DDm0A5b/NmXxkMoNs7i0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=McVHnJdgNHLRllXMLFhHg0l1s2Cesk+wuOEa6P0SvcNnuVdaqr8t3UIVjBtQe35QaE er9ZXAMNnLrpCCRvcI6TTPvZiJjbRGyuu0e+k0mplchsWVNBgnFP953Xwnc08C4QuM2/ cbF+5IhtyhxsT3ZxdZmdC/OHqOC95aJpObRXc= Original-Received: by 10.103.11.7 with SMTP id o7mr2905895mui.95.1249241070639; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?88.128.13.69? ([88.128.13.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm23816829mue.20.2009.08.02.12.24.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A341) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113564 Archived-At: Emacs 22 (TTY) comes with OS X by default. Also, if users upgrade to Emacs 23 from the "sudo make install" based 22 to 23, then this may happen (haven't tested though) and then this is definitely our omission. Even a warning in emacsclient would have gone a long way. On Aug 1, 2009, at 21:18, Christian Lynbech wrote: >>>>>> "David" == David Reitter writes: > > David> That is why the existing 22 emacsclient binary (which is in > PATH) > David> stays in place > > But how did the emacs 22 client get into PATH? > > Obviously, if one is mixing distributions such as fink or macports > with > a new emacs 23 app, trouble could be expected. > > For instance CarbonEmacs.app has its emacsclient in > > /Applications/CarbonEmacs.app/Contents/MacOS/bin/ > > which isn't automatically copied to typical PATH places. I could > then be > lucky to have installed something which did put a compatible > emacsclient > into my PATH, but I would consider that more as an accident than a > conscious action of some .app. > > > ------------------------ > +----------------------------------------------------- > Christian Lynbech | christian #\@ defun #\. dk > ------------------------ > +----------------------------------------------------- > Hit the philistines three times over the head with the Elisp > reference manual. > - petonic@hal.com (Michael A. > Petonic) > > > > > > >