From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chetan Pandya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change in rmail-reply Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:01:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <597051.6409.qm@web83201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <87myd9cj98.fsf@xemacs.org> <28265.24804.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233363710 18788 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2009 01:01:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chetan Pandya , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 31 02:03:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LT4GE-0001dP-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:03:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4Ew-0003IU-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:01:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4Er-0003IB-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4Ep-0003Hk-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43912 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4Ep-0003Hd-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from web83201.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([216.252.101.45]:27033) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LT4Ep-0007ke-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 16848 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Jan 2009 01:01:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=0OWR+Yz72fQQC3Fcv2LP990CiikqF9F4MgQGRaYxbwTZPB7ncUkUCA2gkQ3LaVwwNjrdhoDqEmlordX5YgJkjTbtx7IzN/xHhoXGVG1w5DeSyVCjRs34jqiFPSjL0hfci2NqBV03xGcwrFAiBCxf3lJjon+tHB+uVX3PzQE3HAc=; X-YMail-OSG: deRpPPQVM1nG5oOskAJlA50cqmIU7GuO8peogSGfI.45o98NxCzoy6Cpt5MsR_.BJw-- Original-Received: from [75.36.178.29] by web83201.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:01:33 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1155.45 YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108426 Archived-At: One thing I don't like about this command is the potential for misuse - unless this is one of the intended uses. The problem is that the recipient of the message may have no idea that the message is not really received from what it claims to be, if the recipient MUA does not look at the resend headers. This might look like deception. Granted it is already possible to do it by other means, but the question is whether it should be made easier to do so.