From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <59046B45.8000201@gmx.at> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzfwkv0.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <58B54703.7060103@gmx.at> <87h93ciwyt.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <58D38082.8050104@gmx.at> <87h92kxeuu.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <58D4E07C.8010504@gmx.at> <58EC7C80.6070207@gmx.at> <87lgqlaamy.fsf@moondust.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493461881 3965 195.159.176.226 (29 Apr 2017 10:31:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: "N. Jackson" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 29 12:31:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Pem-0000qs-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:31:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Peo-0007so-RG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Peb-0007rB-U0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeZ-0005hK-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeZ-0005hG-Ez for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeZ-0004dl-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:31:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:31:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.149346184117756 (code B ref 25851); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:31:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2017 10:30:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeC-0004cK-RD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4PeB-0004c6-EN for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3S2C-1dvHJZ0AAi-00r3oy; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:30:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lgqlaamy.fsf@moondust.localdomain> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OjxguqPQRb+EFl/JWngpZ+AwgEFPf5pq94LnGDLsWn62ARgwRXU q884zQ0t0ErOP8zkGcXBfAd0Sf/gShU2sAObCdu2aexlDYEqpA97l1IV3YMls3u3qTSgR3z 00jg6X0M0VexdZNNf7U0XJfkYDxdYpsB41F9KRCqtOxEoF7vMZ8gVlfRyM01umkDLtomFTP FE5+M3j5a5/DtJNiFGq4w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:A/HblV6X45s=:rh4UYPduWKv+mNeEOG7IOL dzQx/ogbx3VroJcddMzxIywZMqBjUChhRT5lMDYKOJEyAA+XdOC43DR+F4Lbt71lVtE2wz1RW onbicb+HQUUrq6B1jUXXHhuhCKgUUZr0ikfhD2ewGk1mK+eH59fNqgjhbP7oKd6rMYF8F8Oav efBxfODwZcYdJpOsVG+1YifceVFG+LNfdn6nEyEUB/w0HP8iJ4VsoWNcitA8QWuUiftGl5WMw 26SYQYb7GCa5pCu51g3Bs4shF4W7rlBiZ/6RfNuh4lwqE2E1oH1beyeJXrPzoG7FH9hNxgKRo PeZpgNVjLCg+TXLlmM2QPGUsumxW4+PmmxtgIgPp/tILoe//yzWlaNeaMSI7JWLvY1A6T4PMm IaDF7NkhKm4Qvbj3Iex0XR8jAFWlbYiR5YHtHP//8cciqYMI6MHGX2SGN6B+blxCPY42zQt9E 0mIQHrh2t8/AO99/iQ/cT1sop5OoQKIOnP46aT+9158FdMfgXjQ9V2YqT2zansgmvjbxCejo9 uU9Z98VY2YvbJwMb+ed9k91WfCMpDQ7oV8Ni05UISeo9S8nBorCkEJ6CnpZL7QeU3KIpoxf3y H07LALCN43RxEa6hrmGQxBtJ25VaYrDmTzniIkcNyKNI+PHmGhmmXjM4MRI2KBl28DcDxEfOY O6Q632Spph29NctZQchaWzB10xPnja8c/0NrJYugJlEFWb0AOOVc4uFvNVNjDyIA9jU6dHLK4 irsUl6ClhGnl11vTwM7DlktB21LSmc3wq2MfF2wDsrGGhi76TYI7CSMUFT9BxZxlvdipfih7 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132095 Archived-At: > Also I had no problems, over the past month or two, using your fix > to the definition of `xg_set_geometry' from Message #122 > (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D25851#122) which > also fixed the bug successfully in Emacs 25.2rc2. > > Is there any possibility of your patch being cherry-picked to > emacs-25? Or is the plan to go to Emacs 26 next, rather Emacs > 25.3? > Is there any possibility of your patch being cherry-picked to > emacs-25? Or is the plan to go to Emacs 26 next, rather Emacs > 25.3? Currently there are no plans for Emacs 25.3. But doesn't your Emacs 25 already contain the patch? The only difference I made lately was to set the default value of =E2=80=98x-gtk-use-window-move=E2=80=99 so all you h= ave to do is to make the last line of your xterm.c read x_gtk_use_window_move =3D true; martin