From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 17:02:43 +0000 Message-ID: <58bb8030d532070ed420@heytings.org> References: <83mtjwzwkb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r198ytog.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnvyb5y.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl03j10s.fsf@gnus.org> <9D116A4B-622F-4C80-83E6-2CDD7ED9AD25@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33252"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 22 18:04:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBJoK-0008RS-UB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 18:04:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBJoJ-0004Ht-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:04:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBJmq-00026o-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:02:48 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:36944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBJmp-0006hS-0f; Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:02:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1642870964; bh=+ZiEP/gpk54ZkVvWkDJm5dGilqyQ6N47hK9Vq0DzmZ4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=Fws5qYF+bT7KFK8wb089vaDgTWmXV7f8IegjYX+fUu+dYssfGwj+T5Tbj1otrzrlr h/T9sKUC7bzlESCvSSTEtta0y8aHYmY2Jhcw87vt/4rv182mMUJbRUcIoG2BGck03I gzef9E2fnNM6XCq/hI1jvq9myXOEdpwd9ZCByEr7NyXsuPgxsRtdcxXPiXLICN2OOn ip2yj4VVVfQU1CdgRD87mlAMksZpvdz+v06AeoWKkLOny5MrjwXJIUAtU0S11NdMHT XgF/ZwlD/blB/KEuDX27anA29vQfTob1RFMHZq6HTmZMh5or5X+SM4gAuwAVhplg6J LRUa2r6F3/hnw== In-Reply-To: <9D116A4B-622F-4C80-83E6-2CDD7ED9AD25@acm.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285217 Archived-At: >> I'd like to see the results from elisp-benchmarks with and without this >> patch set, please. > > In my experience, the elisp-benchmarks are very much not representative > of actual elisp usage, and I have done quite some benchmarking for other > reasons lately. > I don't know what benchmarks would be representative of actual elisp usage, but on my build machine both make bootstrap and make check are consistently ~8% slower on correct-warning-pos vs master: make -j1 bootstrap: 649s vs 596s make -j4 bootstrap: 257s vs 238s make -j8 bootstrap: 198s vs 183s make -j1 check: 178s vs 162s make -j4 check: 44s vs 40s make -j8 check: 26s vs 24s