From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags failing with structure members Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:27:48 +0100 Message-ID: <58C3D124.1070501@gmx.at> References: <58C25BCF.4010704@gmx.at> <831su5fpx7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489228115 1958 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 10:28:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 11:28:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmeGE-0008OR-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:28:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmeGK-00034W-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmeFk-00034G-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmeFk-00014z-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:63590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmeFe-000114-54; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:27:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.14]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lmvlg-1cL0bj2UHM-00h3qf; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:27:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831su5fpx7.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:N438dpgoE4MXOjYbDYGKJtGjDA7maFpqtD14NEgfGy+kMb+hevn u0Y7VtTXyTOPKqG9azongLt+5kYmqd5ExlOGV/znAarpkX8z0uJGRw5G/hW354fhG8WPrtH qIbK/S4wZLLBSNNdQzaJsDBwkoMN4uOh9z1zQiudCumYjqWU8WlQ8qy34waxYo+jeuNcvn7 rLCze813kDvzvbzqVSJng== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:66+eWn3D0y0=:ESfeEVnWcng3diFC+CiRnS bHyVQ3fi0gO6QvGijwWCYDBTgZg7XirBwcflNquzjNUtPs9gEWXd8Im5hmv10CmtugxXbklZb 8WMrcxDi2r/FOiaikL1KX8Db3rqE0Zc/KN/SCCKljiQhTP8TJh5XrYbyUiveJ0HxkHS0vgE2f p2n9/5kn3ppwIZhSH/4gcPcqvXwlfPZUSms+vw5hFlInekosbFJv36PwVqekt3A2V6B7uzqmu 3t5/5xWvGCmGP4HUhLpdymJj3YNZ+8z3xmNYb6g5b64OFCgHY/lj7EwngCwep2+7m6QDKJ9sa XUWehML8ht7NmT0NoxwMigJjNO22K8fE4o/+pzYPEESvtLSD1Klx0P91+KJ7yz4pu3B12S2zC 1Pjcu/oG/oI084bkMFU0JIg56IvApAxJPn3EY5GwC6cCt2g3Tqx5lVybzqK6QEWpjxmbKlGSw KH8IG5Qzfq14i2NCcHFFfPtue78o9JYqsh3+zInj++Iavw8VHXn+XOMoOYUFpiJ67qqIWuEK8 ZE0qh41fhVtz5fuQ232tv/UVMu73rKyeZe9DVAwC3f9XE2+A+p3P7yOsl64wqgQhYG7EtFjPo KXe2zu/rl2j7leqhw3DqvCkW5idk5g8oz60wZ3jfIWIFfGko7N76B9XRJAZpakPFApj3yXI15 ReqVEVn0wcDLl4IgWqJGvNLyPmDPLAN2/GZtAHJWmrli1DQ6GgjvjAOES4cw4tMyn1Io5xj6l 02fVjAn7lMnU0DYcD9NZfmS5zrDpqHOq8aojShb9WVY97snMazVl38iGKU5DrnjuWE9w4WZx X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212899 Archived-At: > This is a known problem: I thought so. That's also why I didn't report this as a bug. > the tricky macro syntax used by some of the > header files run afoul of the etags parsing. I tried once to find a > solution for that, I might look into this again. Can you explain with a few words why the macro syntax interferes? The lines in question don't seem to differ much from lines that are handled correctly. Thanks, martin