From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25408: Remove Decorations Around Emacs Frame (Windows OS) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:39:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5875EF34.20507@gmx.at> References: <587499E6.9030205@gmx.at> <838tqietdj.fsf@gnu.org> <587522DB.2050105@gmx.at> <831swaepnc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484124033 30010 195.159.176.226 (11 Jan 2017 08:40:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arthur Miller , =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 11 09:40:29 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRES2-0005sK-3h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:40:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52240 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRES6-0005hv-HQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERx-0005eQ-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERu-0005pB-DC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERu-0005p1-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERu-00082C-0G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25408.148412397430841 (code B ref 25408); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2017 08:39:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERS-00081N-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:56252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRERQ-00081A-KZ for 25408@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.20]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQiVh-1c1Xdb0RbB-00U63s; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:39:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GSOQlnS2tO3LI0NkL/sSxjFgPmrNLHQO+loP3irh+6xIdOdd2gy MoLfyGMmzB9eJNJfUgwMPNGpqSNr7qGgxpWLcAVcjprSs8XkfMQk6I3n1nCA4gZHmprSO7U m4/2q5Wt5iJAWkK68zEbBPoNaNEHUa3AGJT8RmcCdQNjrZD/NAxd29uXl26WtNB1S5SC9DQ PwNvDgGuGR4jjo03CZDyg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Gqp5iO4jaD8=:kCKS5Ysrv4GZPrW67VUDtz /x08pUL2LrJD3/sd3/gsHPc2usjQW112xZkXePvcRrc72a2JNQ/9/bK1U7n0JhBtwpjVrnVZW Ov4jGknCyoweD+Fa0vzQJsqqT5FHfy/9JNlXuMoOT08CbwFDqKnxbczm8XputnnkQbvn1WPb/ iyc0jdexlpbasNPXUk2h/33B5jHQqOHnG+SvdAJ/JliE4rWvpPRRKPmeBV7wWC96XQrPMyCJv d/YtCPhYuovq58w+6fPEGtnQptxd/VV9DZBOIPuflNE41FAnFsRsMCp2jho7KWx2za4Mz4bNq aY8IDKssHuVCKp/oilCV6exWbX5SPFUucqdmA4LwIE8GhF0bhQGdJtseg2ANi08s1VadlyHdD X6r6eR+Skfwe93lRqhlXmxVzd09/YW+oGuWdTubQcqKt7SgE/uIO8YXofNL96LTKFOWVhpvaA +RVt447U2kJCq02cOyDvyo5GdrNZYe/uG5GuTPJEZmJqCbvCaKyqhC/OSeT7G9dqd9YgKcl67 SnaEoPl2gCVOBErfpRQWa8ydNyuuf2rFQj5S7+/LRFOYY/Ur9Fz8ySJnvvzP2v5niR1chJMXH wc+38WO7XRfgDaGpZn1KVUHVloSkr+aKa8arTp6heGjNa0PET0YybUMKpfyhpGjJQvtERK8C5 FE31sXtQlHqriaTg5BIjW6zJeNhwHUYNdhAPfmIv1RqKQm34wu2c8IwSlTqMuWb/YH7ZWP8Ei 0YgicIha1YkDblvQ47ETT2kUnB2q/eQQC8qdwB4zpf6gMS/rz2ZuCB3bPr9wFj+Ms1aJUCQI X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127991 Archived-At: > There is a slightly cosmetic issue with above function. When one switches > back on decorations, > the frame will not resize properly and minibuffer will be not visible. It's > there but just > covered by frame. Just resizing emacs framefixes it. > > Adding call to PostMessage(hwnd, WM_SIZE,0,0) in Martins function fixes it. This is not necessary here. And it would be strange since the idea is that the outer frame size remains unchanged. Hence, any problem would manifest itself already when you remove the borders by leaving parts of the display area reserved for the frame not redrawn. The image you posted in the message you sent just now seems to confirm that. But I'm testing this on Windows XP and have not yet pulled the recent multi-thread Emacs changes. martin