From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 a9c48d5: Additional fixes for file notification Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:51:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5871b504-1f25-47ae-960c-1bbe52864365@default> References: <20160222175244.30186.2617@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87k2lwv5ob.fsf@gmx.de> <87egc4v4hs.fsf@gmx.de> <8bd4ec21-1306-41bf-aca7-5571a3014337@default> <87r3g4js64.fsf@gmail.com> <877fhuq2bw.fsf@gnus.org> <8737silq8u.fsf@gnus.org> <7355e6dc-a6a1-c7ae-afef-740eac1cf1c3@yandex.ru> <87oab6160a.fsf@ulb.ac.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456332729 9420 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 16:52:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:52:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Nicolas Richard , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 17:51:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYcfK-0002Zk-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:51:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYcfJ-0004if-Bd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYcet-0004iO-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYcen-000346-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:51:27 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:51416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYcen-00033s-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:51:21 -0500 Original-Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u1OGpJ2m009910 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:51:20 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1OGpISP013238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:51:19 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1OGpIip014248; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:51:18 GMT In-Reply-To: <87oab6160a.fsf@ulb.ac.be> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200623 Archived-At: > Unfortunately, the terms "natural numbers" is ambiguous enough that > the Wikipedia page about them states very early : =20 > Now if you look at the German version, you'll see the first list > omits 0, and only afterwards they mention 0 can be included too. =20 > Anyway, this has only limited implications IMHO : the docstring > should be explicit about what the function does, including which > convention of "positive" or "natural number" it follows (maybe also > referencing natnump from the docstring of plusp). This seems to have veered off from the topic. Please consider taking this to Tangents, or at least starting a separate thread.