From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25228: [emacs-bug] bug#25228: 25.1; GNU emacs 25.1: custom-set-faces from init file ~/.emacs ignored Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:44:45 +0100 Message-ID: <585C110D.7070009@gmx.at> References: <5858289B.2070500@gmx.at> <83fulj4uhu.fsf@gnu.org> <58584121.1070404@gmx.at> <83d1gn4pl2.fsf@gnu.org> <58590F28.9040309@gmx.at> <20161221081104.3nd6sga4cyi6q7wl@boole.suse.de> <20161221084746.j6taegtb76rufwek@boole.suse.de> <585A43B3.3090702@gmx.at> <20161221110847.zh2fhyrcxiji4sdf@boole.suse.de> <585B9042.2080800@gmx.at> <20161222114616.vp6xa5kh6h3dcd34@boole.suse.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482428718 12235 195.159.176.226 (22 Dec 2016 17:45:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25228@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Dr. Werner Fink" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 22 18:45:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QQ-0001vU-6t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:45:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QU-00088o-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QN-00088R-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QM-0004lN-1J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QL-0004lD-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QL-0002MK-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25228 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25228-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25228.14824286989044 (code B ref 25228); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25228) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2016 17:44:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51816 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QI-0002Lo-0t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53070) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cK7QG-0002La-01 for 25228@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.91]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9aX9-1cQUXw1SBT-00CzOa; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:44:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161222114616.vp6xa5kh6h3dcd34@boole.suse.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:J0/amwoH9LY80lx7yCzFf8byi4ov8oYRBUV6z+Of2pxTQAWJGwQ QudQddeRQlIiRjxkmCnoJ7ah9+OoT+PzQ7UMO45Q7w9GBp6/BcRi2jZkgXybnhHbCMhzTK0 m2xnJS+U8b2lPMEGrlo9mrAxfvmzxxJpbXFdHOIfvhYoNnyNRjNG9dXDvzaugsfL8+PrGQh 5goPO9m9w73xpuS2brZCw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xW1OS23Xn1Y=:uReAetB4+Of4xv//U4nAts XujKVyG6f7eeXAfg0iTN35bbUwJh8yslntQ1p0VhRrNfNXPearjdYYE1IVjGsFFYpbGvl5TcV XjzOPzO27DCsLnqYSZWQ9q2eGG4bNQFsP9+IVWK5tj/KMULkm3wDB4yEaZj1Qz5NQR4lk8Guf cG22o00oqMWup3bX4GozVS1Bj120RXiySwL/zNx6hGJiZFDkunKeWtwc/BvHyIvDo+IjUTzqq yU/2FPnu8M4raTHsmvFQUNHRi1ToOlcXr44ayoJ5xxwR2k8qhUoCy+1JeliavWVOvHzL1pjIk Vr+ulSxNebk2UNpgw7oCrZXuuHm8lUrYrcLCWBOjo2RYj9l+F3pRXRCsXzzA+nPZc3HhEEA/K 6b7D4SMNHehW7oRryPaTXY3h8CVN5ZDykOAua2speTDbvDumxcVTlbwXxr5d5N32nbrPO1m3Q dunuSbsll6vk05ao9qfHb5uqR95qo7SKt03wCiFP5CN8MqTgPixVewl4Giv0XCp448QzpY9qC Qq8OUspjZlrMJDPIEaCrK/GjKgWjl726zL8oQ/x3Eujrwlxkp5pZqZO+ijKUXzRm8gS6laJ4T BuwNzkLdk/QHnZT3VN94d9iqUQJUttKOkd49Xcc438W+TwhCdMT0PmLPy71kI0eCQOBeyhmET gkW2OSWK+6NllFfjbDpQO3VUXfTsJk8YcjpGZm08gGxuWlKJxZyPUe37oeJ6+kkahEWpnvY44 5InKXaJYAzHIVkgqdAm3V927lFEZrWN1UNfmxNcHjvuLExpznmbOmuru0Di9SdpKc3iRnZCw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127334 Archived-At: >> What are the "both (custom-set-face)"? Can you give me an example? > > That was > > (custom-set-faces '(default ((t (:family "Source Code Pro" :height = 110 :weight normal :slant normal :width normal))))) > (custom-set-faces '(default ((t (:family "Monospace" :height 110)))= )) > > which in fact do show exactly the same font at the same attributes her= e. I'm still too dense to understand you. Do you mean that one of these has been implicitly specified in the GSettings file, the other in your =2Eemacs and although they would result in the same default character height, Emacs detects a difference in =E2=80=98font-setting-change-defaul= t-font=E2=80=99 and switches to a larger font? martin