From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25228: 25.1; GNU emacs 25.1: custom-set-faces from init file ~/.emacs ignored Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:18:03 +0100 Message-ID: <585975DB.3040203@gmx.at> References: <83oa074y73.fsf@gnu.org> <5858289B.2070500@gmx.at> <83fulj4uhu.fsf@gnu.org> <58584121.1070404@gmx.at> <83d1gn4pl2.fsf@gnu.org> <58590F28.9040309@gmx.at> <83vaue37ib.fsf@gnu.org> <58595B67.7030305@gmx.at> <83pokm34yd.fsf@gnu.org> <58596B9B.4050001@gmx.at> <83mvfq32pg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482257969 11674 195.159.176.226 (20 Dec 2016 18:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rostislav.svoboda@gmail.com, 25228@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:19:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0Q-0001Fh-8O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:19:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52857 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0U-0008K7-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0G-0008IG-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0A-0005C3-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0A-0005Bn-Hg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJP0A-0000FI-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25228 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25228-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25228.1482257902881 (code B ref 25228); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25228) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2016 18:18:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJOzW-0000E9-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:18:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJOzU-0000Dr-Ed for 25228@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:18:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.55]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdKgV-1c20h6030t-00IVdI; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:18:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mvfq32pg.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jWyhZm9Uio+/yVUFvc1Pf9mucPEAGwSw9+p+5+hPSKMDt5ufVm5 DiDFUQf91zvUkB90/wEpx2HcsYv9DN8/oeX5XoV+NBqR7qe1uvBSHa2gcpFxNlOBt7D1R7P 7gSUtQt7qNAraDHZ6dx7EJyjCiXx8MqlEcfAFiPz51ZHOhwDqWv6hZ7EIHhvXad6MHOtfDG NtS7zozmtRyrRj1295P6Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:URm9RJW84+Q=:engjmadGZMRj7aasLvMBJr /5ae1Df69zLPVlTqxr1gzrGgqRnrZTxBAU5i8cRxKBaTMvG0Ro6KWtNtVKxhpscuym2OW8n3f W84IsV5vrVoM/chgFYnIZSyQ5YA0JItzcXfj1NYGuU+gySFTcgp4beBSA5cH25qi9y3/3kySe KeaR3GvepW6fJgXgLwIoAeCcod5D3Yh9KX1SGtCQC0/ovAvKSgwMBp91xsW+3L8VENLqgFylv n6ZVPfjUtc+Lql3aT38KCQpzmMyPisDPt6WG35/M6FKvVNya8bdKbizI5SCTMIQ8YH8eXU5s8 NfQ3xWNbHWrNjPT3H59aoDt11XB3+EaLA9FQeTIinmXWgXcCqwej9ZbXbcx6AiI/hfy/+lw1t ZMIlGlfv62VlbBf0YY7SUoTmx9Xe/DON7HqDnxM5hShJP9km5xFNoBBYEQqczr9s06nKlD8ku S4Cp2EVpkD8GQSHm69ijStQfBUXnJgYr2VDx4ApodRermdEVZbdI7EkJoZKg6ysKnbzPoiw5V DDeaJUOEq4s7QjqiKqCfDw06DR3o1X3frcMNOMlE+9NplKz8ibEbSp9TcopYinyzVsuXh9uHf YiTTvdYYV0XB39ARn/1p7pob9YvIga8kGYXyOeK/nJUaytKIFjr4zCwvzrKWw3c+xYpFnqIdE /i/+JyHAO+lDMiUTeF+HkspT4HjsxsepinTu0NgxrH71DWoLeF0O+i7wH250rK3FhojvZNCAS 8xpToZBPmGcfJbpAda0ULL0tr1HYoZuXteNf/zD+cvXqZj7/9DJ3aD+8cj2I157PTL9e9TKM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127258 Archived-At: > So all this disaster happens because 96.281588447653434 compares not > equal to 96, is that right? Here ;-) That's why I wanted Werner to counter-check. And there was the original author of this issue - Rostislav Svoboda. IIRC I tried to contact him once but he did not respond, anyway let's try again. > Would the problem be solved, both for you > and for Werner, if we compare these values after rounding them to the > nearest integer? It looks to me that xsettings.c reads the new value > as an integer to begin with, so it makes no sense to compare > fractional values. And AFAIK about DPI (which is very little, and > nothing about Gsettings and Xft), the DPI values are always integers. Nothing guarantees that such a silly discrepancy does not show up somehwere else. But I certainly won't mind using this as workaround for Emacs 25.2. martin