From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25054: 25.1; bury-buffer makes bad choice of next buffer Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:14:03 +0100 Message-ID: <583C81FB.1080908@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480360524 28371 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2016 19:15:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:15:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= , 25054@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 20:15:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROS-0005hP-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:15:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60677 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROV-0004o0-W5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROM-0004kT-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROI-0003cA-2a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROH-0003c5-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBROH-0000ko-PW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:15:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25054 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25054-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25054.14803604622836 (code B ref 25054); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25054) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2016 19:14:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBRNe-0000jf-7d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:53828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cBRNb-0000jS-Vb for 25054@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.59]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M96Jd-1bzfHU1Smb-00CRLe; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:14:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MW9ipiTh8you+bjRBYtVzI7Mel5l1eFABCw/Dig1+Lfu1MekKaL YCtIuZNsBkcT+cJiSsnris1MNm/fsiFAsDny6zMBdbPSFdG8050JHu0IAGfc/ehQPq0dbtx pUWeBRJV24c1t+FNcx4qHjZTzbhTYQz/hMlkWqZa/qp58+doonNxFo7SGHLY3ZJC9wRdPuC baXAtZwYVjP9hytNEyTXw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xnR9pzexUtU=:54rZfDEKb7FGwCfcnUyOod gpe6obfJ8TSW81HCBgrZHtuiI9T/iXZ6SW05rNcCq11yCOofU4gtU/w7jIAuVBUZm0vI3dX0I mP6ZjCh0USJ8Da+kZLjvdVvK7j91H4Q4CkjZM3GlHvM1kwuJDVf7FxjTIEdM0BYKefLes8k2l tv9HY0jhwqDyZl2EZxxImSvv0waQO46dGEzxkKzAHeWEGMDif02Pf8EMKgdLzLAldum1UVvIg Gj4/BjwMS+JS2ERSXsF94hjFqD3a4zchRZPZXM6SBDpy5aerWGEyRkwTQsUj5e4WKN1fLwCbC /B0J7LtAU4OKh2MYwo1OefTvvwpT8llj3jLYCiA6+2ZUmcfLwIJVH5JhhxxDVtO6ajuwPML3Q VN8nUp/CX2VK+AmG02GjHTT532kFqEOrFky3fG9Z0YLWz+K2FneqgwAm15uHLlVCOJncunTxJ TbF+s4yyH27v8xPbXEWeMZzS9mEO3Cu1mT9Dy0EhQPCuYdGvqqBNa9kp7jMghO/lCB6+dYbxh zwBDbf2khtlh4YvHkOVI2cPq+DdxjnDKnwm67vqDMpJU43TB/DG1MBequhshCg9nZ3eo5X1uj 4C2Gl2kH4PPLzDp/A3kiddrab25sEdUI/RCBopFrc+BWX/HIpJHkRl2pH9XlK2wd9bptkiKkG qQelUNBwkIX/qZ+b+nxzEOxWKrrvG6KMyor24FstQ5STCfSlT84DFsYq6FiQoQfGPVcM3MNU5 Vahi34Wh9zyfMMP96VnipQ/+pbOUl0xBsvDaBVuzJuwMl4X6ERc8BZQJf6y5ExuDc4vsHI/S X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126219 Archived-At: > If I have the screen divided into two windows showing two different > buffers and issue M-x bury-buffer on one of them, the window will show= > the same buffer that is shown in the other window. > > This is different from what it was in Emacs 22, and I find it very > annoying. Unless there is good reason for the new behaviour, the buff= er > displayed should be the "other buffer". To reproduce: > > C-x 1 RET > C-x b a RET > C-x b b RET > C-x b c RET > C-x 4 b d RET > M-x bury-buffer RET > > Now both windows show buffer c, while the current buffer should displa= y > buffer b. Please try with =E2=80=98switch-to-visible-buffer=E2=80=99 customized to = nil. martin