From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Davis Herring" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Willing to debug bug #3542 (23.0.94; File access via UNC path slow again under Windows) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58260.130.55.118.19.1247599938.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> References: <7dbe73ed0907051401o26903ca3t9a67060f3a3417ad@mail.gmail.com> <83fxda1pef.fsf@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907060038w53699f77ie742996955ae8118@mail.gmail.com> <838wj11sz4.fsf@gnu.org> <83my7fz09s.fsf@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907081347q12dfd1a2lbbff915c49362f75@mail.gmail.com> <4A55D68D.8050407@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907090453s3e125b4ar142b90a268b105e2@mail.gmail.com> <7DAFC004A33C486A9E29A59689E7F02E@us.oracle.com> <4A5619F5.8010008@gnu.org> <8363e1zoak.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbxjrmue.fsf@gnu.org> <83ws6cqudb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tz1gqr33.fsf@gnu.org> <83prc4q7ef.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocrnqdqa.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: herring@lanl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247600034 16629 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2009 19:33:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 14 21:33:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQnl3-0001MF-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47970 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQnl2-000749-Vt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQnkx-00073d-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQnkr-000733-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36165 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQnkr-000730-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint1.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.25]:45278) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MQnkn-0002D6-7J; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint1.lanl.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6EJTSHY006082; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:33:24 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327601A8E1DA; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:32:18 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (webmail1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.106]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3821A8E1D7; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:32:18 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: by webmail1.lanl.gov (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1B1241518033; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:32:18 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from 130.55.118.19 (SquirrelMail authenticated user 196434) by webmail.lanl.gov with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ocrnqdqa.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.7.lanl5.newsieve X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-07-14_13:2009-07-03, 2009-07-14, 2009-07-14 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112465 Archived-At: > That's not what I meant. What I meant is the problem that could > happen if encoded_dir's value was foo^@bar, and there was also a > directory called "foo". Won't we then opendir "foo"? Of course. But is the equivalence between "foo" and "foo^@bar" fundamentally worse than the (almost: consider symlinks) equivalence between "foo" and "foo/"? Maybe it just doesn't matter much. > And what if opendir was replaced by unlink? Nothing. You can't unlink directories. ;) Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.