From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24500: 25.1.50; Can't other-window from minibuffer if Ediff control panel frame present Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 19:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: <57F92EE8.3030203@gmx.at> References: <83a8f1f8l0.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvj0dkhd.fsf@gnu.org> <57E6CE51.1040600@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475948301 16667 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2016 17:38:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 17:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24500@debbugs.gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 19:38:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZc-0003D9-Bv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 19:38:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41917 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZa-00044P-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZU-000445-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZS-0008Vk-0f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZR-0008Va-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZR-0000FE-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24500 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24500-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24500.1475948279932 (code B ref 24500); Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24500) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2016 17:37:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZO-0000Ex-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:57362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsvZM-0000Ek-Td for 24500@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.17]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfjJY-1bY6tl1A0q-00NCnC; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 19:37:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WA7V7quhBWIS2bP1IS/NWsuyeK4//5VLrVbNcwW10mtx84O3FfS r3i1AxmeZ41cBk8Jx2y7mKbL/ozCyVsLl5OQREy61uDsGTaHjEoumQBEsOOkUMsl39Rf6P+ OFET4HeOTSGKI7YZSZL0Rpj0L2MLsGsBwnXRnULDLAYjqpOWcV6PU4xOKbay1swfVZkRZmh 6ck2xZJVe2x2H9VMiwGiQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XukFtUbi4/s=:7kIuWPXgJqMoTINiHaBL9D 7n6BPAMuIb9XMJk0cC1xyX5C9afUK3AcsqjVKP2WLImxeJ0JJM6oYCb3xJDD0Gmg7i4aQArFp fXqyCWTVlueavkOt1BkLJMfH6k8houq1evJE8pR1y6OVRZhPIwnZRN75k4QhR7RZbhXutBkSo ptPoOOgCfZaKkCtNvtmZtSTH9rWoi1osIUK0bROeYJx6+DUSi/zwZFULzWkiSVpk9iu/uJIor +vidg2NGAyR9bOFMM4YpmT4bh9gOvpwO+iH86DqXn6VzF2nOkYKYjGV9JEEIMZRaoVvjE4LgG /8m8AD+ARIpvQM+1ywBRy7yT6xQcrrrsjS+CKjOkw3egIRY6DCc9aro1eed1VwEcPb7N8J34g xj0kxuhVgHpSqxq9kpJC8rggoZ2x+0We80kjgWNEQVmcRYthvlzRjXOaDMAesqud/XWlj6jXo L0EksmcUL7SOOHAF7+ZIyt+UTfldb/xlH4mkDanjlKHmdFbRqUDMvSDwmItqzkEtcM3AHqY6l a0Fm0zH0hxOai7NTmNXlN09ZfI+sC7cmJgmE9OHUHZsNgL85lrs/no/2o71dLNzIIm3OX+xdA tTBRDKpgINP5tbYov+09Vfz4LqWS9rk+jC7Dy8RqprwVlo82/UCb3DXerKL4kpe1L8jgLoz9G 9QNTyysxZjVpxd+mwXuZ4XENL9A+LTOX3Kx/z2ys0C1jM53OTTSR5A1fhDbRJmslLB1aSXkpe nd8rpzCfUbWU7GWNmUC9A/GjADw5LytjMs9Qly9A6qI3Kq6gd7/5PgzszvXQ2BPUNABcytDT X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124232 Archived-At: > I've been using the window.c patch for a few days and I haven't noticed > any badness. I see the following problem with emacs -Q: Evaluate (make-frame '((minibuffer . nil))) In the minibuffer-less frame do M-x In the minibuffer type C-x 5 o In the minibuffer-less frame type C-x 5 o Now back in the minibuffer typing C-x o does nothing. You can only get out via C-x 5 o. The situation improves on the unpatched one because there is a way out of this loop and in particular one your typed before. Still this is only a 50% solution. When we do C-x o and we do not redirect focus as in the frame.c patch, frame focus sticks on the minibuffer. We should tell Windows to direct focus back to the minibuffer-less frame. I'll check this on GNU/Linux tomorrow. In any case, consider reconsidering. martin