From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24091: 24.5; High CPU usage at startup while hidden Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 17:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> References: <24533f31-9fc2-b38e-aaeb-561616cdf77f@gmail.com> <87shut9pyk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lh0lq9n5.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5fp1zb.fsf@gnu.org> <877fbkw7b1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83inv1fnf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zinodghv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y438de6m.fsf@gnu.org> <57CBCE4F.5040705@gmx.at> <57CC1E5F.8010107@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473004705 14093 195.159.176.226 (4 Sep 2016 15:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aiken , =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , 24091@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 04 17:58:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZoH-000307-Ri for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 17:58:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZoF-0000HS-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZo8-0000GT-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZo2-00038V-5E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZo2-00038Q-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZo1-0005Zc-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 15:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 24091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24091.147300462321344 (code B ref 24091); Sun, 04 Sep 2016 15:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2016 15:57:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZn5-0005YC-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52184) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bgZn3-0005Xh-W6 for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 11:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.47]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNZ9u-1bjM011WJ8-007GQ1; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 17:56:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pnJFyWF5JJ+0+FVjAsjO7os6jbK6bA4s59xt8phEKX8YVn58swH biN9m5ITxHDHhKUlO94MAuwIPNVLptnSID0bXjSlAILPIZvFxncADsxpbWO3ra3qqRD+lgt a2UCcHA8RU4YQMID0HYRraWY89qjN6iyLe8fumQbTZPKCkhye+A2nHMgaFiXsln1ScifiXf 7BbcpnrNFCSEjfzYK8aug== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:i5Ld/zKkL7o=:G4S1vQZuc+RMAUgt6aI8tr /q+FtCM1fMWYhgWb00lgZ8oy0uFk7iCj06X8Owu7vIaBk112DYpAX2IK45JYym1ZGLb6bM3xm M5JCtOOMcVeolj6pIrhpsswgFqSd02y+ZTzAuUsMwE3zx0lkUouippSKfiMtt2CxKU+CUFeYT 8j7H/WCZNuu9PgY29NlR3r09jTBoT+D4l0ItKjzNgOy7wICJNJ/JoMOvEjaJChq+Xc7dPffvs Ra1+4k1kwrPxjbgR4tRcdoYWqBH/bDsBinXeL4aMz/XykS67dwd+Ce2yrAZrLzFukjtrGh2/V fwHnAp8v4I4vVtGYRwRtbdez1+QznGK7dKNg/+9IbyWn/e5+2bORDTSr5nd9RYKZzs0mxZTxb dDTjvOziynTqpj9HjvziUYdfMUVeas407VvjKMZOoe9d8sbXfgdnidRhelfeWe9s+mvQMrrUq XMbUm3raMcwuDqr0x01L4shPDDHN0imGLhPIMz93UnRmkNLM2NwSdcQugJMvHrkVByjk/G5/K TTAJeJbqcU7ciBoUUTiVn1AwJVUimlUjRbwqVQ8G54QPcoGYEcgW/jqP1trzGW+91Cc7sESsy RtRytIep7vauzqTafcoENGV6PhkK1vfOBKnWPVVMFDAtySGxFKRpy9aA7G9tElosu4ehI2Pgs x455UumhVFoPg/02rHVJaVpoNpGzGQenbeIyUOVRhrRXyw+NAD+N058/tjUzgpcd30uG9Frwx Hz+WqHKmvZ2odLeJomyYkr8a5c5x3d7bSXE3M2jZa923nSLsMBw2od5RK+p6+VOhkCPV5U1X X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122935 Archived-At: > Having trouble parsing your sentence. This happens before > x_make_frame_visible gets called, and before the actual frame is > visible. Is that what you're asking? Sorry for being unclear: In x_make_frame_visible we have this loop: while (!FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) What I wanted to know is whether the frame f here is the _same_ frame you see in x_top_window_to_frame where IIUC if (wdesc == XtWindow (x->widget)) return f; fails. I see no other place where "(wdesc == XtWindow (x->widget)) is false" would apply. Or am I missing something? martin