Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter

[martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>]

 > Dunno what you mean by "care about it".

Care about the issue(s) that started this thread.

 > Just what are you proposing
 > to change, so as to no longer "care about it"?

Nothing.  As long as nobody cares about these issues.

 > I have code that does things to frames, and checks whether a given
 > frame is a standalone minibuffer frame.  My code typically checks
 > whether it is just MY standalone minibuffer frame, by checking variable
 > `1on1-minibuffer-frame'.  But more generally such code would check
 > the `minibuffer' frame parameter.  I don't see why we would eliminate
 > that possibility.

I don't want to eliminate anything.

 > And I believe that Juanma's frameset code carefully distinguishes
 > standalone minibuffer frames from others, by checking that parameter.
 >
 > I think that Emacs users should continue to be able to test, as well
 > as set the `minibuffer' frame parameter.  Why shouldn't they?

Because IIUC they do not care much about "testing" it.  Otherwise they
would have complained already.

martin