From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23925: 25.0.95; display broken when maximizing frame Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:29:53 +0200 Message-ID: <57849C71.7040009@gmx.at> References: <26943.50736.587398.22400@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83wpkvgua6.fsf@gnu.org> <5780C7C0.5000607@gmail.com> <578118AC.1070402@gmx.at> <5781AA6D.4030803@gmail.com> <5783635B.2030602@gmx.at> <5783DB9F.9000104@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468308696 18213 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2016 07:31:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:31:36 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , 23925@debbugs.gnu.org, Roland Winkler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 09:31:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMsA8-00049c-VA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:31:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMsA7-0001Pq-Eg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs9t-0001MR-VF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs9m-0002wN-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs9m-0002wI-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs9m-00081H-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: help Original-Received: via spool by 23925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23925.146830860830745 (code B ref 23925); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2016 07:30:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47532 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs8u-0007zp-Dx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:65392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMs8t-0007yT-Fk for 23925@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.25]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhOO8-1b0kn23hGy-00mfdX; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:30:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5783DB9F.9000104@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Nk/cL/XA1kEkAp3PyDFONMJBos3rY07Znaq+lexGZ4sSGgbAtVq dfko3hlaHDXSUD+9YDFoMSk9hKEwmw1eeHWwRscvxZ7h5WOjmM8yX6uSL+ZKa6cgpDKs1gS uuuKO0FuiIRoeakhNDUjtJD741ufOoL3xvVQsRUqY4gkmzMzOzAwPgUv2HUmV6ZBBVdKraW 7jSqHw88AirGAYMC5dTkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:VCndZbHdKek=:Y0PZwInuA0YYQGwqKi8LiS sNbHyMDq0jTPBuhrdVFqiLjlmTis6m2BPtfMp1SXwhy2+uPNpjLNPP7jo/+/I8M9TgLabYmE0 oNttNlIv60rqizaSigGB0lViwRmOFU7vs8rYyfUUrq4i8/nINBzuNhO23BAJuVRgoXPVyRhDX lISMv9KRtei6sbRahuxC6heZHxIwv01mMdj+skKOkWnMpu9N90gM+fFqsM2FOH3Dtdzz1x8Bo 3Wz0wnS79bSKMml17RNTQzlyUBG5BSwQKh6LWgw/si3eLQAuacFu9NjpvkdG4INmBS9z5aVK1 sGSKnGe1K+hRS+RwkoJX7NSZg5Zk1Khyc0BdKoK5FaQq9w6JT/n9o/jAkLZoYIoW6uT4s9evc AMmiipwv8Uq5rhct484F5ok0ECxFscdsr6NEc4ihKWw4s+tP9IzIsQd6HCBgOLEnS9dkZatM4 CQ8DvpQV4pV/NvCo9/1ZkbTs5aPVGO9RS/fcHY/zkJNEUbeqrPyfGyk4Q69bVEk6s/w/ytzWJ C4T9FbErKS3PIZJ+pCzjotwvFZCeMSFV4rvORjExmkW55rr7DK9iyoIjT7PrGwYl5AuC5ZTgQ eHBZe5xfoAz1JkD0wiKBLfASIXfu97YL8c4k/JfazTDvYdMrm/2iatw31euJvqrfAlsD+tz/r 3+R4PbpgWQOqE2sZQfuS9vtjt/cQgSjmR7jWySoAtOyS4K+8mpC0c+xJPbpUpy366gBmK5G+F cYQLwplasIG33Vy9zETgut6+zLEa3qekLkJWLbItDCFhN1qv3vshbX3OeUABWFaxqZZwjeTG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120894 Archived-At: > In a non-cairo build, I get: > > ((outer-position 0 . 0) (outer-size 1920 . 1055) (external-border-size 0 . 1) (title-bar-size 0 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1920 . 22) (tool-bar-external . t) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1920 . 44) (internal-border-width . 0)) > > frame pixel: 1920 x 964 cols/lines: 240 x 56 units: 8 x 17 > frame text pixel: 1891 x 964 cols/lines: 236 x 56 > tool: 0 scroll: 13/0 fringe: 16 border: 0 right: 0 bottom: 0 > > # parent: nil > pixel left: 0 top: 0 size: 1920 x 930 new: 947 > char left: 0 top: 0 size: 240 x 54 new: 54 > normal: 1.0 x 1.0 new: nil > body pixel: 1891 x 913 char: 236 x 53 > width left fringe: 8 left margin: 0 right margin: 0 > width right fringe: 8 scroll-bar: 13 divider: 0 > height header-line: 0 mode-line: 17 divider: 0 > > # parent: nil > pixel left: 0 top: 930 size: 1920 x 34 new: 0 > char left: 0 top: 54 size: 240 x 2 new: 1 > normal: 1.0 x 1.0 new: 0 > body pixel: 1891 x 34 char: 236 x 2 > width left fringe: 8 left margin: 0 right margin: 0 > width right fringe: 8 scroll-bar: 13 divider: 0 > height header-line: 0 mode-line: 0 divider: 0 Is it on purpose that you used a tool bar, a menu bar, scroll bars and a different font height in the non-cairo build? This way the results are not easily comparable. Anyway, I meanwhile built with cairo myself. The GTK build exhibits more or less the original problem - though sometimes the frame seems to maximize correctly. In addition, scroll bar sliders may disappear at will and resizing the echo area doesn't behave well either. A Lucid build shows similar symptoms - its scroll bars behave better, though. martin