Re: What makes set-window-buffer slow?

["Clément Pit--Claudel" <clement.pit@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 944 bytes --]

On 2016-06-23 15:11, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Instead of hypothesizing, I suggest to profile your code with
> profiler.el.  If indeed redisplay is taking the time, you should see
> that in the profile.

The profile doesn't show that, unfortunately; in fact, we spent a significant amount of time trying to understand what was taking all that time by looking at the profile, but nothing in there was taking more than 30% of the time, and even optimizing away a function that according to the profile took 28% of the time didn't yield a measurable runtime difference.

Commenting out the call to set-window-buffer (or predicating it on the window not already displaying the buffer), on the other hand, does yield a 95% performance gain.  set-window-buffer does not appear in the profile; redisplay_internal does appear, but it only is credited with 30% of the execution time.

I wonder what might explain these results...
Clément.




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]