From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What makes set-window-buffer slow? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:45:56 -0400 Message-ID: <576C2054.3020705@gmail.com> References: <576C04E4.9040000@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DRTMbnv8weUmeX7OV2RPvOuwFdiRM7tAt" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466703993 11188 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 17:46:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 19:46:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8hp-0007qj-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:46:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8ho-0006eZ-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8hd-0006cu-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8hX-00046c-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:56134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8hX-00046O-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.26.2.123] ([18.26.2.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSJ5v-1aoPcB0Ijz-00TWEP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:46:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y9Oo7PJ/YSZjarRDWxMYt3ydFhVwhdWw1vO40nvrRJ1Y3pFbmsk /2ObLgFXQ8QOamLNmOez8TL24Euw9IDDZX7WInShSqRIkqU79ZAYvqcug7V+cuvCfGiWbHf ps6aimujxjaHynn15pHuR0dB781KK+K8rZzRHKxXfkrHdO4LtMu5IVia0b+xxkODIbYhiFu oz0+uY2NUuzrMm+DIrxLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:J7dl8CY/hgQ=:o3dcxVLfxtPhSxLJjCr+AW PK8BZfLCTMHlHXdZC48sI4IFp274VJwHfrliQarzVX/QzfixsfLACwdJXxG5J06TBl06yokis i9g2X9hv71aj/uM7eZNHnkU/uSuU6JXjgSINOz37BBeIK7T1J79hjqjrhfcM3m5Tzy7ld6zLS XC+AkdV5uxXdgmkSWtd2xM0zEvzhVnh2/tWdgDWgJVbov64aE8jH8omlGrsZGrQl8cjj1Q+1Y vdVSV8+IY6yoAECIf81v6YxZTmvrH7H+8QAZa1wWlQR1hNeYn5cEaB3oABKnR+Wh5wg3r1HVt pMxzS3TD1RWcf0L7J0IqTa4Ksizh0VUhjMWRDLowQWor4dHCdXl9z+/4jVooz6gijQine34SK aWSVYMWISA5BPGcLJUV9VEkEbcHwepsy4vrkngIXVy58IrRDUZMSMimFdNgOQWYE8ImT3x7GB A+x+I6rKGAnWR7pQV9WYC00Nvbhz6nvwRydldS5Ggx1uiZR9eX2GmmzhJQx+96CdgT2xjSHxi vmU4PjbCAH2k07hGZIprqvRpJkjTCnGQv7n/2FBxIXm4tiWRdSoVu4CPrcEbkTDVQIGZS2F04 JPkSl8nlam2WYFGVlR6Lzgj24FV/LiO1aSNvNuRxtecem2mZK65ZA5DBM63HBIYh09ucP6EHl ZO61oQP912HuOUOWjvAlKiR07BdfqyX7glKX8JApO6hqxuEdEh3+YQaxw9gXij73BDKs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204697 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --DRTMbnv8weUmeX7OV2RPvOuwFdiRM7tAt Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1ovidqioE7ipPfElQ8K2qQeQ9t63pkjJS" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Emacs developers Message-ID: <576C2054.3020705@gmail.com> Subject: Re: What makes set-window-buffer slow? References: <576C04E4.9040000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: --1ovidqioE7ipPfElQ8K2qQeQ9t63pkjJS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for this suggestion! I probably have to investigate why redisplay = is slow, then; that's bound to be rather tricky :/ Is there a reason for set-window-buffer to trigger redisplay if the windo= w was already displaying that same buffer? Cl=E9ment. On 2016-06-23 12:01, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Perhaps it's because set-window-buffer marks the window for redisplay. >=20 > Andreas. >=20 --1ovidqioE7ipPfElQ8K2qQeQ9t63pkjJS-- --DRTMbnv8weUmeX7OV2RPvOuwFdiRM7tAt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXbCBUAAoJEPqg+cTm90wj9VYP/ReVNXLYk/Ath6UdcfEjPMZ0 yc+OAyMKz4dpdmPyBri79iqlVIUYtlQJnUTihlFvlCRoc1Izc0ZS5wGV9lsfjr6l ut+kykyRH5hBy+eaLU0WlLjAipS7RCDOtlk5czUKiQb/DRbcaziWyjswIJepCa3k xBFcCjv0GT0G+qGSxHW0saqqMZvvKvqs+SoMSo4/0+O6vzkAvsvISXrkrbGWnn1O xdg1t4cyTsr5SvjC4IqUWuWU6gQR5TDmBG4jQjTZXe29hgyOt2jei25aVee/WgEy zGenzrVJcODpQWiNfe3R0Cv8PVOKgaFr5oAbmZRq6pcwNofP/v8yBCz/PVky4+fc ch6822hdm19RMzzTb8uEOyIQWSGvRqzg80g8Kl/51XUpVCYGEYKXVoDZn+oDudX+ DDuGFM+dZHbXRA+2WDcRC2r1hLjmOHJwYMYqnmf09myXTMSFDv+rrgqXRYrpnN/0 910wylTw9IbvOoumR2nvc7yyj5ejH2BtortDrYrma/+uWQQpNOtIthqqKTqv5cHq LbFZBU6AfvlRuuF1KKQMDFAw8gl8017SBR6ZFEPinr2MH4JnUjfQe8OZcWmEENMU g614F0Mk2mk03DdINqbDWTwXG/nO4DZcp65JcoEMTlqF0UywX6aGCAdTrQxaL6+E pFFkgOeM1a33eEqlmoX0 =gyZg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DRTMbnv8weUmeX7OV2RPvOuwFdiRM7tAt--