On 2016-06-23 09:45, Clément Pit--Claudel wrote:
> On 2016-06-18 14:09, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Probably not. Last I checked, Ido only supported "simple" completion tables,
>>> such as lists and alists (and maybe obarray). Which is a shame, in this and
>>> other use cases.
>>
>> Indeed, it's too bad and it's actually surprising since the main two
>> cases where ido is used (buffers and files) both use functions as
>> completion table.
> 
> Btw, ido-ubiquitous seems broken in the latest master; is this expected? Even in ido-ubiquitous-mode, C-h f doesn't use ido completion anymore.

C-h v is broken as well, but not C-h o.