Re: Python interactive navigation around nested functions

["Clément Pit--Claudel" <clement.pit@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]

On 2016-06-20 04:28, Andreas Röhler wrote:
> On 20.06.2016 09:34, Stefan Monnier wrote: 
>
>> So both python-modes behave identically in this respect.  That would not
>> be surprising if the behavior you don't like is the one usually
>> considered as right.
> 
> Start and end of a functions definition is not about like or don't like.
> Also not about "usually considered".

I don't understand your aggressiveness, nor your point.  Stefan is just pointing out that C-M-a doesn't usually go to the beginning of the enclosing function definition (and the docs don't claim that it does, either):

  (beginning-of-defun &optional ARG)
  
  Move backward to the beginning of a defun.
  (...)
  With ARG, do it that many times.  Negative ARG means move forward
  to the ARGth following beginning of defun.

I agree with the OP that it would be very nice to have a way to go back to the beginning of the "current" defun (some sort of super C-M-u).  But I don't understand the vitriol.

Clément.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]